Quality of pulmonary function testing in 3 large primary care pediatric clinics in rural North Carolina.

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary function testing (eg, spirometry) is recommended by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute as part of basic asthma management. Previous research has shown that spirometry is feasible in primary care settings.

OBJECTIVES

In this retrospective study, we sought to describe the proportion of spirometries meeting American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) quality criteria in children with asthma evaluated in North Carolina primary care pediatric clinics and to characterize predictors of spirometry that meets ATS/ERS quality criteria.

METHODS

Medical records and spirometries from January 1, 2001, to August 1, 2009, were reviewed and analyzed from children enrolled in a larger asthma study that focused on communication between physicians, children, and caregivers. Children were eligible for the larger study if they were between the ages of 8 and 16 years and had received a previous diagnosis of persistent asthma. Children were enrolled from primary care pediatric practices.

RESULTS

Spirometry was not acceptable, on the basis of ATS/ERS criteria, in 75% of cases. Approximately 19% of spirometries used incorrect or outdated predictive sets.

CONCLUSIONS

More than three-quarters of spirometries in these primary care pediatric clinics were unacceptable. Changes or lack of changes in asthma management may be based on unacceptable spirometry. Additional education and training regarding accurate spirometry and interpretation are warranted.