University Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Skull Base Team, Sint Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Aug;32(6):914-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182255968.
To study hearing outcome in revision stapedotomy cases where extensive erosion of the long process of the incus was observed in a consecutive series where a malleovestibular prosthesis was used versus a consecutive series where hydroxyapatite (HA) bone cement was used to rebuild the eroded long process of the incus and integrate the prosthesis.
Twenty revision cases of surgically treated otosclerosis where extensive incus erosion was observed during revision surgery.
In the earlier consecutive series, 10 cases were treated with malleovestibular prostheses. In the later consecutive series, 10 cases were treated with HA bone cement to rebuild the incus-prosthesis interface.
Air-bone gap, bone-conduction thresholds, and air-conduction thresholds were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 to 3 months. Last audiometry available also was reported (median, 12 mo). Pure-tone averages were calculated according to the guidelines of the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium for the evaluation of conductive hearing loss. Raw data were displayed in an Amsterdam Hearing Evaluation Plot.
Six male patients and 14 female patients were included. Age varied from 34 to 75 years (median, 53 yr). The median postoperative air-bone gap at last follow-up audiometry was 15.6 in the malleovestibular prosthesis group and 13.1 dB in the HA bone cement group. No short-term or intermediate-term adverse reactions or unsuspected bone conduction deteriorations were seen.
HA bone cement can be successfully used to reconstruct the long process of the incus in case of extensive erosion of the long process. Intermediate-term hearing outcome is comparable to the outcome of a series of similar cases treated with malleovestibular prostheses. Because the placement of a malleovestibular prosthesis is technically more difficult and presents a high risk to the inner ear, we think HA bone cement can be a useful alternative in these difficult cases.
研究在一系列连续病例中,使用镫骨-前庭假体和羟基磷灰石(HA)骨水泥重建侵蚀的镫骨长突并整合假体的情况下,在翻修镫骨切开术中观察到广泛的砧骨长突侵蚀的听力结果。
20 例接受手术治疗的耳硬化症患者,在翻修手术中观察到广泛的砧骨侵蚀。
在早期连续系列中,10 例患者使用镫骨-前庭假体治疗。在后来的连续系列中,10 例患者使用 HA 骨水泥重建砧骨-假体界面。
术前和 1 至 3 个月评估气骨间隙、骨导阈值和气导阈值。还报告了最后一次可用的听力测试(中位数,12 个月)。纯音平均值根据听力和平衡委员会的指导方针计算,用于评估传导性听力损失。原始数据显示在阿姆斯特丹听力评估图中。
纳入 6 名男性患者和 14 名女性患者。年龄从 34 岁到 75 岁不等(中位数,53 岁)。最后一次随访听力测试时,镫骨-前庭假体组的术后气骨间隙中位数为 15.6dB,HA 骨水泥组为 13.1dB。未观察到短期或中期不良反应或意外骨导恶化。
在广泛侵蚀砧骨长突的情况下,HA 骨水泥可成功用于重建砧骨长突。中期听力结果与使用镫骨-前庭假体治疗的一系列类似病例的结果相当。由于镫骨-前庭假体的放置技术难度较大,对内耳风险较高,我们认为 HA 骨水泥在这些困难病例中是一种有用的替代方法。