So Y T, Olney R K, Aminoff M J
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143.
Muscle Nerve. 1990 Nov;13(11):1032-6. doi: 10.1002/mus.880131106.
We studied 20 asymptomatic control subjects and 14 patients with clinically unequivocal cervical radiculopathy to compare the diagnostic value of thermography with that of electromyography. We measured the average skin temperature of designated regions over the neck, shoulder, and upper extremities. We then compared the temperature between corresponding regions of the two limbs, and between fingers innervated by different roots in the same hand. Thermography was abnormal in 6 patients (43%), whereas electromyography was abnormal in 10 (71%). Thermographic abnormalities were seen only in the hands and fingers, and the pattern did not follow the dermatome of the clinically involved cervical root. When compared to electromyography, thermography provided no additional diagnostic information. Thus, thermography does not have an established role in the evaluation of patients with cervical radiculopathy.
我们研究了20名无症状对照受试者和14名临床诊断明确的神经根型颈椎病患者,以比较热成像与肌电图的诊断价值。我们测量了颈部、肩部和上肢指定区域的平均皮肤温度。然后我们比较了双上肢相应区域之间以及同一手部不同神经根支配的手指之间的温度。6例患者(43%)热成像异常,而10例患者(71%)肌电图异常。热成像异常仅见于手部和手指,且其表现并不遵循临床受累颈神经根的皮节分布。与肌电图相比,热成像未提供额外的诊断信息。因此,热成像在神经根型颈椎病患者的评估中没有既定作用。