Suppr超能文献

热成像在腰骶神经根病评估中的作用。

The role of thermography in the evaluation of lumbosacral radiculopathy.

作者信息

So Y T, Aminoff M J, Olney R K

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

出版信息

Neurology. 1989 Sep;39(9):1154-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.39.9.1154.

Abstract

We studied 27 normal subjects and 30 patients with low back pain to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of thermography in the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Thermographic abnormality was defined as the presence of either interside temperature difference exceeding 3 standard deviations from the normal mean, or an abnormal heat pattern overlying the lumbosacral spine. In patients with clinically unequivocal radiculopathy, thermography and electrophysiologic study were similar in diagnostic sensitivity, and the 2 methods agreed on the presence or absence of abnormality in 71% of cases. However, the thermographic findings had limited localizing value. Relative limb warming was often seen in patients with acute denervation on EMG, and limb cooling in those with more chronic lesions, but the side of the root lesion could not be identified confidently by thermography alone. Moreover, thermographic abnormalities appeared not to follow a dermatomal distribution and failed to identify the clinical or electrophysiologic level of radiculopathy in most cases. Thus, the thermographic findings are nonspecific, of little diagnostic value, and of uncertain prognostic relevance.

摘要

我们研究了27名正常受试者和30名腰痛患者,以评估热成像在诊断腰骶神经根病中的诊断准确性。热成像异常定义为两侧温度差超过正常均值3个标准差,或腰骶部脊柱上方出现异常热图。在临床诊断明确的神经根病患者中,热成像和电生理研究的诊断敏感性相似,两种方法在71%的病例中对是否存在异常的判断一致。然而,热成像结果的定位价值有限。肌电图显示急性去神经支配的患者常出现肢体相对温热,而病变较慢性的患者则出现肢体发冷,但仅通过热成像无法可靠地确定神经根病变的部位。此外,热成像异常似乎不遵循皮节分布,在大多数情况下无法确定神经根病的临床或电生理水平。因此,热成像结果是非特异性的,诊断价值不大,预后相关性也不确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验