Suppr超能文献

评估保乳手术后放射治疗(RT)后的肺纤维化:常规体外束放射治疗(EBRT)与电子术中放射治疗(ELIOT)的比较。

Assessment of pulmonary fibrosis after radiotherapy (RT) in breast conserving surgery: comparison between conventional external beam RT (EBRT) and intraoperative RT with electrons (ELIOT).

机构信息

Division of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Aug;10(4):323-9. doi: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500209.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and the grade of RT-induced pulmonary fibrosis in patients who underwent EBRT compared to patients who underwent ELIOT. One-hundred-seventy-eight patients enrolled in a prospective randomized phase III trial to compare the efficacy of ELIOT (a single dose of 21 Gy prescribed at the 90% isodose) versus EBRT (50 Gy to the whole breast plus a 10 Gy boost to the tumour bed), underwent a spiral 16-detector row Computed Tomography (CT) examination to assess RT-induced pulmonary fibrosis: 83 patients in the EBRT arm and 95 in the ELIOT arm. All patients (age range 48-75 years) were affected by unicentric infiltrating carcinoma of the breast with diameter < 2.5 cm. This study was approved by our Institutional Ethical Committee and informed consent was obtained from each patient. Two observers, blinded to patient's randomization, independently evaluated each CT examination and assigned a fibrosis score (Grades 0 to 3). Inter-observer agreement for the fibrosis score was evaluated and a consensus between observers was obtained. Differences in fibrosis score between the two arms were evaluated by Chi Square test and Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). Pulmonary fibrosis was diagnosed in 42 patients (23.6%): 38 (90%) were in the EBRT arm and 4 (10%) in the ELIOT arm (p < 0.0001); twenty-six of them were Grade 1 (one ELIOT), fifteen were Grade 2 (three ELIOT) and one was Grade 3. The post-radiotherapy risk in the EBRT arm to develop at least Grade 1 fibrosis was 19 times higher than in the ELIOT one (OR: 19.20; 95%CI: 6.46-57.14) and 6 times higher to develop at least Grade 2 (OR: 5.70; 95%CI: 1.56-20.76). In conclusion, CT detected pulmonary fibrosis in patients treated with ELIOT is significantly less frequent compared to patients treated with EBRT.

摘要

这项研究的目的是评估接受 EBRT 与接受 ELIOT 的患者之间放射性肺纤维化的发生率和严重程度。178 名患者参加了一项前瞻性随机 III 期试验,以比较 ELIOT(单次 21 Gy 剂量,在 90%等剂量线处规定)与 EBRT(全乳房 50 Gy 加肿瘤床 10 Gy 加量)的疗效,他们接受了螺旋 16 探测器排 CT(CT)检查,以评估放射性肺纤维化:EBRT 组 83 例,ELIOT 组 95 例。所有患者(年龄 48-75 岁)均患有单侧浸润性乳腺癌,直径<2.5 cm。本研究得到了我们机构伦理委员会的批准,并获得了每位患者的知情同意。两名观察者对患者的随机分组不知情,独立评估了每一次 CT 检查,并给出了纤维化评分(0-3 级)。观察者之间的纤维化评分一致性进行了评估,并达成了观察者之间的共识。对两组之间纤维化评分的差异进行了卡方检验和优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)评估。42 例(23.6%)诊断为肺纤维化:EBRT 组 38 例(90%),ELIOT 组 4 例(10%)(p<0.0001);其中 26 例为 1 级(1 例 ELIOT),15 例为 2 级(3 例 ELIOT),1 例为 3 级。EBRT 组发生至少 1 级纤维化的放射后风险比 ELIOT 组高 19 倍(OR:19.20;95%CI:6.46-57.14),发生至少 2 级纤维化的风险比 ELIOT 组高 6 倍(OR:5.70;95%CI:1.56-20.76)。总之,与接受 EBRT 的患者相比,接受 ELIOT 治疗的患者的 CT 检测到的肺纤维化明显较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验