Guilhot Nicolas
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), French West Indies.
J Hist Behav Sci. 2011 Summer;47(3):279-301. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.20511.
International relations theory took shape in the 1950s in reaction to the behavioral social science movement, emphasizing the limits of rationality in a context of high uncertainty, weak rules, and the possibility of lethal conflict. Yet the same discipline rapidly developed "rational choice" models applied to foreign policy decision making or nuclear strategy. This paper argues that this transformation took place almost seamlessly around the concept of "decision." Initially associated with an antirationalist or "decisionist" approach to politics, the sovereign decision became the epitome of political rationality when it was redescribed as "rational choice," thus easing the cultural acceptance of political realism in the postwar years.
国际关系理论形成于20世纪50年代,是对行为主义社会科学运动的回应,强调在高度不确定性、规则薄弱以及致命冲突可能性的背景下理性的局限性。然而,同一学科迅速发展出适用于外交政策决策或核战略的“理性选择”模型。本文认为,这种转变几乎是围绕“决策”概念无缝发生的。主权决策最初与一种反理性主义或“决策主义”的政治方法相关联,当它被重新描述为“理性选择”时,便成为了政治理性的缩影,从而在战后岁月里促进了政治现实主义在文化上的接受。