Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2011 Oct 15;87(2):464-71. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
Immobilized enzymes have an advantage over enzymes free in solution in that they are easily recovered after completed reaction. In addition, immobilization often gives enhanced stability. Entrapment of an enzyme in the pores of a mesoporous material is an attractive procedure since the enzyme is immobilized without any covalent bonding to a support which may be detrimental to the catalytic performance. The objective of this work is to compare the encapsulation and catalytic performance of lipase from Mucor miehei and trypsin from bovine pancreas, two hydrolases with rather dissimilar properties and structures. We also demonstrate the importance of the pore dimensions and the pH for proper function of the encapsulated enzyme. Mesoporous silica particles (SBA-15) with three different pore sizes (50 Å, 60 Å and 89 Å) were synthesized and hexagonal structures with narrow pore size distributions were confirmed with TEM, SAXS and N(2)-adsorption. Lipase and trypsin were encapsulated separately in the silica particles and the results indicate distinct differences between the two enzymes, both in loading capacity and catalytic activity. For trypsin the encapsulation rate and the loading capacity were large with a maximum reached at pH 7.6. The largest product yield was obtained with the particles with 60 Å pores, however, the yield was significantly lower than with free trypsin. For lipase optimal encapsulation rate and loading capacity were reached with the particles with 89 Å pores at pH 6.0 but were low compared to trypsin. However, the catalytic activity of the encapsulated lipase was more than twice as large as for free lipase, which can be explained by an interfacial activation of lipase at the silica surface.
固定化酶相对于游离酶在反应完成后易于回收,具有优势。此外,固定化通常会提高稳定性。将酶包埋在介孔材料的孔中是一种很有吸引力的方法,因为酶在没有任何与载体的共价键合的情况下被固定化,而这种键合可能对催化性能有害。本工作的目的是比较脂肪酶(来自米根霉)和胰蛋白酶(来自牛胰腺)的包封和催化性能,这两种水解酶具有截然不同的性质和结构。我们还证明了孔径和 pH 值对包封酶的正确功能的重要性。合成了三种不同孔径(50Å、60Å 和 89Å)的介孔硅粒子(SBA-15),并用 TEM、SAXS 和 N(2)-吸附证实了具有窄孔径分布的六方结构。脂肪酶和胰蛋白酶分别被包封在硅粒子中,结果表明两种酶之间存在明显差异,无论是在包封率还是催化活性方面。对于胰蛋白酶,包封率和负载能力都很大,最大值在 pH 7.6 时达到。在 60Å 孔径的颗粒中获得了最大的产物产率,但与游离胰蛋白酶相比,产率明显较低。对于脂肪酶,在 pH 6.0 时,89Å 孔径的颗粒达到了最佳的包封率和负载能力,但与胰蛋白酶相比,负载能力较低。然而,包封脂肪酶的催化活性是游离脂肪酶的两倍以上,这可以用脂肪酶在硅表面的界面活化来解释。