Becker Lorne A, Hom Jeffrey, Villasis-Keever Miguel, van der Wouden Johannes C
Department of Family Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 475 Irving Ave, Suite 200, Syracuse, NY, USA, 13210.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6(7):CD001726. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001726.pub4.
There are no clearly effective treatments for the cough of acute bronchitis. Beta2-agonists are often prescribed, perhaps because clinicians suspect many patients also have reversible airflow restriction contributing to the symptoms.
To determine whether beta2-agonists improve acute bronchitis symptoms in patients with no underlying pulmonary disease.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 2011, issue 1 which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (January 1966 to February week 1, 2011) and EMBASE (1974 to February 2011).
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which patients (adults, or children over two years of age) with acute bronchitis or acute cough and without known pulmonary disease were allocated to beta2-agonist versus placebo, no treatment or alternative treatment.
Three review authors independently selected outcomes and extracted data while blinded to study results. Two review authors independently assessed each trial for risk of bias. We analysed trials in children and adults separately.
Two trials in children (n = 109) with no evidence of airway obstruction did not find any benefits from oral beta2-agonists. Five trials in adults (n = 418) had mixed results but overall summary statistics did not reveal any significant benefits from oral (three trials) nor inhaled (two trials) beta2-agonists. There were no significant differences in daily cough scores nor in the percentage of adults still coughing after seven days (control group 73%; risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 1.09). in one trial, subgroups with evidence of airflow limitation had lower symptom scores if given beta2-agonists. The trials that noted quicker resolution of cough with beta2-agonists were those with a higher proportion of wheezing patients at baseline. Adults given beta2-agonists were more likely to report tremor, shakiness or nervousness (RR 7.94, 95% CI 1.17 to 53.94; number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) 2.3).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to support the use of beta2-agonists in children with acute cough who do not have evidence of airflow obstruction. There is also little evidence that the routine use of beta2-agonists is helpful for adults with acute cough. These agents may reduce symptoms, including cough, in people with evidence of airflow obstruction. However, this potential benefit is not well-supported by the available data and must be weighed against the adverse effects associated with their use.
对于急性支气管炎引起的咳嗽,尚无明确有效的治疗方法。β2受体激动剂经常被处方使用,可能是因为临床医生怀疑许多患者同时存在可逆性气流受限,从而导致了这些症状。
确定β2受体激动剂对无潜在肺部疾病的患者的急性支气管炎症状是否有改善作用。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)2011年第1期,其中包含急性呼吸道感染组的专业注册库、MEDLINE(1966年1月至2011年2月第1周)和EMBASE(1974年至2011年2月)。
随机对照试验(RCT),其中患有急性支气管炎或急性咳嗽且无已知肺部疾病的患者(成人或两岁以上儿童)被分配接受β2受体激动剂与安慰剂、不治疗或替代治疗。
三位综述作者在对研究结果不知情的情况下独立选择结局并提取数据。两位综述作者独立评估每个试验的偏倚风险。我们分别分析了儿童和成人的试验。
两项针对无气道阻塞证据的儿童(n = 109)的试验未发现口服β2受体激动剂有任何益处。五项针对成人(n = 418)的试验结果不一,但总体汇总统计未显示口服(三项试验)或吸入(两项试验)β2受体激动剂有任何显著益处。每日咳嗽评分以及七天后仍咳嗽的成人百分比方面均无显著差异(对照组73%;风险比(RR)0.77,95%置信区间(CI)0.54至1.09)。在一项试验中,有气流受限证据的亚组在给予β2受体激动剂后症状评分较低。那些指出使用β2受体激动剂咳嗽缓解更快的试验是基线时有较高比例喘息患者的试验。给予β2受体激动剂的成人更有可能报告震颤、颤抖或紧张(RR 7.94,95% CI 1.17至53.94;伤害需治人数(NNTH)2.3)。
对于无气流阻塞证据的急性咳嗽儿童,没有证据支持使用β2受体激动剂。也几乎没有证据表明常规使用β2受体激动剂对急性咳嗽的成人有帮助。这些药物可能会减轻有气流阻塞证据的人的症状,包括咳嗽。然而,现有数据对这种潜在益处的支持不足,必须权衡其使用所带来的不良反应。