• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过考虑客观和主观反应来规划治疗比较。

Planning of a therapeutic comparison by consideration of objective and subjective responses.

作者信息

von Eiff A W

出版信息

Methods Inf Med. 1963 Jan;2(1):26-9.

PMID:21735880
Abstract

Often in drug trials only the objective, or the subjective responses of the subjects are investigated, depending on the kind of drug. It is, however, desirable to check both the objective and the subjective responses in every drug trial. The investigation of the objective symptoms which is especially necessary in psycho-pharmacological trials, presents great difficulties. When a bodily function is found which reflects the emotional reactions which it is desired to investigate, it is necessary to plan the trial in a way that allows the results to be seen as proof of the effects of the drugs. Proposals for such a therapeutic trial are made. In the checking of the subjective responses the questionnaire is reckoned to be the best method. Problems of how the questionnaires are made and how they are used in the trials are discussed. By checking the subjective reactions, not only the side effects of the drug are demonstrated, but also their therapeutic effects. The author does not agree with the opinion that the double blind test is better than the single blind test in every case. Appropriate investigations should be made to clarify these questions.

摘要

在药物试验中,通常仅根据药物种类来研究受试者的客观反应或主观反应。然而,在每项药物试验中检查客观反应和主观反应都是可取的。在精神药理学试验中尤其必要的客观症状调查存在很大困难。当发现一种身体功能反映了想要研究的情绪反应时,有必要以一种能将结果视为药物效果证据的方式来规划试验。为此提出了这样一种治疗试验的建议。在检查主观反应时,问卷调查被认为是最佳方法。讨论了问卷如何制作以及如何在试验中使用的问题。通过检查主观反应,不仅可以证明药物的副作用,还可以证明其治疗效果。作者不同意双盲试验在每种情况下都优于单盲试验的观点。应该进行适当的调查来澄清这些问题。

相似文献

1
Planning of a therapeutic comparison by consideration of objective and subjective responses.通过考虑客观和主观反应来规划治疗比较。
Methods Inf Med. 1963 Jan;2(1):26-9.
2
[Principles of controlled clinical trials].[对照临床试验的原则]
Methods Inf Med. 1962 Jan;1(1):1-5.
3
[Difficulties of a clinician in planning psychopharmacological trials (author's transl)].临床医生在规划精神药理学试验中的困难(作者译)
Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol. 1977 May;10(3):140-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1094531.
4
[Some reflexions about double blind].关于双盲的一些思考
Encephale. 2008 Sep;34(4):347-51. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.05.001. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
5
Negative signs and symptoms secondary to antipsychotics: a double-blind, randomized trial of a single dose of placebo, haloperidol, and risperidone in healthy volunteers.抗精神病药物引起的阴性体征和症状:一项在健康志愿者中进行的单剂量安慰剂、氟哌啶醇和利培酮的双盲随机试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;163(3):488-93. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.3.488.
6
[Errors of the placebo test].[安慰剂测试的误差]
Phlebologie. 1978 Oct-Dec;31(4):313-20.
7
Placebos, drug effects, and study design: a clinician's guide.安慰剂、药物效应与研究设计:临床医生指南
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Jun;156(6):829-36. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.6.829.
8
Blinding in pharmacological trials: the devil is in the details.药理学试验中的盲法:细节决定成败。
Arch Dis Child. 2013 Sep;98(9):656-9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304037. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
9
The principles of controlled clinical trials of drugs.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm. 1978 Aug;16(8):361-4.
10
[Roaming through methodology. XXIII. The need for randomization and blinding in therapeutic investigations].[方法学漫谈。二十三。治疗性研究中随机化和盲法的必要性]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 Nov 11;144(46):2228.

引用本文的文献

1
[RELATIONSHIP OF AUTONOMIC AND SUBJECTIVE REACTIONS].[自主神经反应与主观反应的关系]
Acta Neuroveg (Wien). 1964 Oct 2;26:587-99. doi: 10.1007/BF01252153.
2
[Double or single blind test in a short term pharmacologic experiment? Effect of psychopharmaca on the function of the autonomic nervous system in healthy persons in this experiment].[短期药理学实验中的双盲或单盲测试?本实验中精神药物对健康人自主神经系统功能的影响]
Klin Wochenschr. 1966 Nov 1;44(21):1224-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01735754.
3
[Influences of the investigator and the blind technique during a pharmacological experiment of short duration in man].
[在人体短期药理学实验中研究者及盲法技术的影响]
Klin Wochenschr. 1971 Oct 15;49(20):1133-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01487589.