Suppr超能文献

通过考虑客观和主观反应来规划治疗比较。

Planning of a therapeutic comparison by consideration of objective and subjective responses.

作者信息

von Eiff A W

出版信息

Methods Inf Med. 1963 Jan;2(1):26-9.

Abstract

Often in drug trials only the objective, or the subjective responses of the subjects are investigated, depending on the kind of drug. It is, however, desirable to check both the objective and the subjective responses in every drug trial. The investigation of the objective symptoms which is especially necessary in psycho-pharmacological trials, presents great difficulties. When a bodily function is found which reflects the emotional reactions which it is desired to investigate, it is necessary to plan the trial in a way that allows the results to be seen as proof of the effects of the drugs. Proposals for such a therapeutic trial are made. In the checking of the subjective responses the questionnaire is reckoned to be the best method. Problems of how the questionnaires are made and how they are used in the trials are discussed. By checking the subjective reactions, not only the side effects of the drug are demonstrated, but also their therapeutic effects. The author does not agree with the opinion that the double blind test is better than the single blind test in every case. Appropriate investigations should be made to clarify these questions.

摘要

在药物试验中,通常仅根据药物种类来研究受试者的客观反应或主观反应。然而,在每项药物试验中检查客观反应和主观反应都是可取的。在精神药理学试验中尤其必要的客观症状调查存在很大困难。当发现一种身体功能反映了想要研究的情绪反应时,有必要以一种能将结果视为药物效果证据的方式来规划试验。为此提出了这样一种治疗试验的建议。在检查主观反应时,问卷调查被认为是最佳方法。讨论了问卷如何制作以及如何在试验中使用的问题。通过检查主观反应,不仅可以证明药物的副作用,还可以证明其治疗效果。作者不同意双盲试验在每种情况下都优于单盲试验的观点。应该进行适当的调查来澄清这些问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验