Suppr超能文献

足底压力时间积分的计算:一种替代方法。

Calculation of plantar pressure time integral, an alternative approach.

机构信息

Department of Health Innovation & Technology, Institute of Allied Health Professions, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, PO Box 347, NL-5600 AH, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2011 Jul;34(3):379-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jul 6.

Abstract

In plantar pressure measurement, both peak pressure and pressure time integral are used as variables to assess plantar loading. However, pressure time integral shows a high concordance with peak pressure. Many researchers and clinicians use Novel software (Novel GmbH Inc., Munich, Germany) that calculates this variable as the summation of the products of peak pressure and duration per time sample, which is not a genuine integral of pressure over time. Therefore, an alternative calculation method was introduced. The aim of this study was to explore the relevance of this alternative method, in different populations. Plantar pressure variables were measured in 76 people with diabetic polyneuropathy, 33 diabetic controls without polyneuropathy and 19 healthy subjects. Peak pressure and pressure time integral were obtained using Novel software. The quotient of the genuine force time integral over contact area was obtained as the alternative pressure time integral calculation. This new alternative method correlated less with peak pressure than the pressure time integral as calculated by Novel. The two methods differed significantly and these differences varied between the foot sole areas and between groups. The largest differences were found under the metatarsal heads in the group with diabetic polyneuropathy. From a theoretical perspective, the alternative approach provides a more valid calculation of the pressure time integral. In addition, this study showed that the alternative calculation is of added value, along peak pressure calculation, to interpret adapted plantar pressures patterns in particular in patients at risk for foot ulceration.

摘要

在足底压力测量中,峰值压力和压力时间积分都被用作评估足底负荷的变量。然而,压力时间积分与峰值压力具有高度一致性。许多研究人员和临床医生使用 Novel 软件(德国慕尼黑 Novel GmbH Inc.)来计算这个变量,该软件将峰值压力和每个时间样本的持续时间的乘积进行求和,但这并不是真正的随时间变化的压力积分。因此,引入了一种替代的计算方法。本研究旨在探讨这种替代方法在不同人群中的相关性。在 76 名患有糖尿病多发性神经病的患者、33 名无多发性神经病的糖尿病对照者和 19 名健康受试者中测量了足底压力变量。使用 Novel 软件获得了峰值压力和压力时间积分。通过 Novel 计算获得的压力时间积分与真正的力时间积分除以接触面积的商作为替代的压力时间积分计算方法。与 Novel 计算的压力时间积分相比,这种新的替代方法与峰值压力的相关性较低。两种方法存在显著差异,这些差异在足底区域和组间有所不同。在患有糖尿病多发性神经病的组中,在跖骨头下发现了最大的差异。从理论角度来看,替代方法提供了更有效的压力时间积分计算。此外,本研究表明,与峰值压力计算相结合,替代计算对于解释特定于有足部溃疡风险的患者的适应性足底压力模式具有附加价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验