Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Ann Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;21(9):710-3. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
We conducted a study comparing the location of addresses recorded on birth certificates with self-reported birth addresses provided by adults who were participants in the Western New York Exposure and Breast Cancer (WEB) Study. We also evaluated whether birth certificate residence data may be used to reconstruct missing self-reported birth residence information.
Subjects were selected from WEB study participants born in Western New York State between 1920 and 1964 for whom we were able to obtain a New York State birth certificate. Addresses were geocoded and mean distance and SD between self-reported and certificate addresses were calculated.
Our findings indicate good agreement between self-reported and birth certificate addresses (77% are within 0.25 mile difference), and no difference in recall for cases compared with controls.
This study provides evidence that self-reported and birth certificate-based addresses may be used together to achieve increased accuracy of historical records in early life when place of birth is used as a proxy for early life environment in relation to the development of breast cancer or other chronic diseases.
我们进行了一项研究,比较了出生证明上记录的地址与参加西纽约暴露与乳腺癌(WEB)研究的成年人所提供的自我报告的出生地址。我们还评估了出生证明居住数据是否可用于重建缺失的自我报告的出生居住信息。
我们从 1920 年至 1964 年期间在纽约西部出生的 WEB 研究参与者中选择了受试者,并且我们能够获得纽约州的出生证明。对地址进行地理编码,并计算自我报告的地址和证书地址之间的平均距离和 SD。
我们的研究结果表明,自我报告的地址和出生证明上的地址之间具有良好的一致性(77%的地址差异在 0.25 英里以内),并且病例与对照组之间的回忆没有差异。
这项研究提供了证据,表明自我报告的地址和基于出生证明的地址可以一起使用,以提高在使用出生地作为与乳腺癌或其他慢性疾病发展有关的早期生活环境的替代指标时,对生命早期记录的准确性。