Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK.
Eur Respir J. 2011 Oct;38(4):947-58. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00030711. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
There is a lack of high-quality evidence on what treatment should be used in children with properly characterised severe, therapy-resistant asthma. Data have to be largely extrapolated from trials in children with mild asthma, and adults with severe asthma. Therapeutic options can be divided into medications used in lower doses for children with less severe asthma, and those used in other paediatric diseases but not for asthma (for example, methotrexate). In the first category are high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) (≤ 2,000 μg · day(-1) fluticasone equivalent), oral prednisolone, the anti-immunoglobulin (Ig)E antibody omalizumab, high-dose long-acting β(2)-agonists, low-dose oral theophylline and intramuscular triamcinolone. If peripheral airway inflammation is thought to be a problem, the use of fine-particle ICS or low-dose oral corticosteroids may be considered. More experimental therapies include oral macrolides, cyclosporin, cytotoxic drugs such as methotrexate and azathioprine, gold salts, intravenous infusions of Ig, subcutaneous β(2)-agonist treatment and, in those sensitised to fungi, oral antifungal therapy with itraconazole or voriconazole. Those with recurrent severe exacerbations, particularly in the context of good baseline asthma control, are particularly difficult to treat; baseline control and lung function must be optimised with the lowest possible dose of ICS, and allergen triggers and exposures minimised. The use of high-dose ICS, leukotriene receptor antagonists or both at the time of exacerbations can be considered. There is no evidence regarding which therapeutic option to recommend. Better evidence is required for all these treatment options, underscoring the need for the international and co-ordinated approach which we have previously advocated.
对于具有明确特征的严重、治疗抵抗性哮喘患儿,应该使用何种治疗方法,目前尚缺乏高质量的证据。数据主要从轻度哮喘患儿和严重哮喘成人的临床试验中推断得出。治疗选择可分为用于哮喘严重程度较轻儿童的低剂量药物和用于其他儿科疾病而非哮喘(例如甲氨蝶呤)的药物。前者包括高剂量吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)(≤2000μg·天(-1)氟替卡松等效剂量)、口服泼尼松龙、抗免疫球蛋白(Ig)E 抗体奥马珠单抗、高剂量长效β(2)-激动剂、低剂量口服茶碱和肌肉内曲安奈德。如果认为周围气道炎症是一个问题,可以考虑使用细颗粒 ICS 或低剂量口服皮质类固醇。更具实验性的治疗方法包括口服大环内酯类、环孢素、细胞毒性药物(如甲氨蝶呤和硫唑嘌呤)、金盐、静脉注射免疫球蛋白、皮下β(2)-激动剂治疗,以及对于对真菌敏感的患者,口服抗真菌治疗(伊曲康唑或伏立康唑)。那些反复出现严重恶化的患者,尤其是在良好的哮喘基础控制情况下,尤其难以治疗;必须使用最低剂量的 ICS 优化基础控制和肺功能,并尽可能减少过敏原触发因素和暴露。可以考虑在加重期使用高剂量 ICS、白三烯受体拮抗剂或两者联合。目前尚无推荐哪种治疗方法的证据。所有这些治疗选择都需要更好的证据,这突显了我们之前倡导的国际协调方法的必要性。