Suppr超能文献

利用人口统计数据更好地解读陷阱捕获结果。

Using demographic data to better interpret pitfall trap catches.

作者信息

Matalin Andrey V, Makarov Kirill V

机构信息

Zoology & Ecology Department, Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Zookeys. 2011(100):223-54. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.100.1530. Epub 2011 May 20.

Abstract

The results of pitfall trapping are often interpreted as abundance in a particular habitat. At the same time, there are numerous cases of almost unrealistically high catches of ground beetles in seemingly unsuitable sites. The correlation of catches by pitfall trapping with the true distribution and abundance of Carabidae needs corroboration. During a full year survey in 2006/07 in the Lake Elton region (Volgograd Area, Russia), 175 species of ground beetles were trapped. Considering the differences in demographic structure of the local populations, and not their abundances, three groups of species were recognized: residents, migrants and sporadic. In residents, the demographic structure of local populations is complete, and their habitats can be considered "residential". In migrants and sporadic species, the demographic structure of the local populations is incomplete, and their habitats can be considered "transit". Residents interact both with their prey and with each other in a particular habitat. Sporadic species are hardly important to a carabid community because of their low abundances. The contribution of migrants to the structure of carabid communities is not apparent and requires additional research. Migrants and sporadic species represent a "labile" component in ground beetles communities, as opposed to a "stable" component, represented by residents. The variability of the labile component substantially limits our interpretation of species diversity in carabid communities. Thus, the criteria for determining the most abundant, or dominant species inevitably vary because the abundance of migrants in some cases can be one order of magnitude higher than that of residents. The results of pitfall trapping adequately reflect the state of carabid communities only in zonal habitats, while azonal and disturbed habitats are merely transit ones for many species of ground beetles. A study of the demographic structure of local populations and assessment of the migratory/residential status of particular carabid species are potential ways of increasing the reliability of pitfall trap information.

摘要

陷阱诱捕的结果通常被解释为特定栖息地中的物种丰富度。与此同时,在一些看似不适合的地点,有许多案例显示步甲的捕获量高得几乎不切实际。陷阱诱捕的捕获量与步甲科的真实分布和丰富度之间的相关性需要进一步证实。在2006/07年对俄罗斯伏尔加格勒地区埃尔顿湖地区进行的全年调查中,共捕获了175种步甲。考虑到当地种群的人口结构差异,而非其数量,可将物种分为三类:留居种、迁徙种和偶见种。留居种的当地种群人口结构完整,其栖息地可视为“定居地”。迁徙种和偶见种的当地种群人口结构不完整,其栖息地可视为“过境地”。留居种在特定栖息地中既与猎物相互作用,也彼此相互作用。偶见种由于数量稀少,对步甲群落而言几乎没有重要意义。迁徙种对步甲群落结构的贡献并不明显,需要进一步研究。与由留居种代表的“稳定”成分相反,迁徙种和偶见种是步甲群落中的“不稳定”成分。不稳定成分的变异性极大地限制了我们对步甲群落物种多样性的解读。因此,确定最丰富或优势物种的标准必然会有所不同,因为在某些情况下,迁徙种的数量可能比留居种高出一个数量级。陷阱诱捕的结果仅能充分反映地带性栖息地中步甲群落的状况,而对于许多步甲物种来说,非地带性和受干扰的栖息地仅仅是过境地。研究当地种群的人口结构以及评估特定步甲物种的迁徙/留居状态,是提高陷阱诱捕信息可靠性的潜在方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25c5/3131019/0e58d7cd0715/ZooKeys-100-223-g005.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验