Skłodowski Jarosław, Garbalińska Paulina
Department of Forest Protection and Ecology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa, Poland.
Zookeys. 2011(100):371-92. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.100.1360. Epub 2011 May 20.
Ground beetle assemblages were studied during 2003-08 in the Pisz Forest by comparing stands disturbed by a tornado to undisturbed control stands. The following exploratory questions were put forward. (1) How do the carabid assemblages change during six years following the tornado impact? (2) Does the carabid assemblage recovery begin during the six first post-tornado years? To assess the state of carabid assemblages we used two indices: the MIB (Mean Individual Biomass) and the SPC (Sum of Progressive Characteristics). Carabid assemblages in the disturbed and in the control stands, as expressed by these two indices, were compared using the length of a regression distance (sample distance in a MIB:SPC coordinate system). A cluster analysis revealed that the assemblages of the disturbed and the control stands were different. The tornado-impacted stands produced lower carabid catch rates, but species richness was significantly higher there than in the control stands. They hosted lower proportions of individuals of European species, of large zoophages, and of forest and brachypterous species, than the control stands. The observed reduction in SPC and MIB, and an increase in the regression distances may indicate that the carabid assemblages had not started to recover from the tornado-caused disturbance. Carabid assemblages apparently responded to the tornado in two steps. Firstly, the first three years were characterized by moderate decreases of index values. Secondly, from the fourth to the sixth year after the tornado, many observed changes became magnified. We did not observe clear signals of the recovery of forest carabid assemblages during the six follow-up years.
2003年至2008年期间,通过比较受龙卷风干扰的林分与未受干扰的对照林分,对皮斯森林中的步甲类群进行了研究。提出了以下探索性问题。(1)龙卷风影响后的六年内,步甲类群如何变化?(2)步甲类群的恢复是否在龙卷风后的头六年开始?为了评估步甲类群的状态,我们使用了两个指标:平均个体生物量(MIB)和渐进特征总和(SPC)。利用回归距离(MIB:SPC坐标系中的样本距离)对受干扰林分和对照林分中由这两个指标表示的步甲类群进行了比较。聚类分析表明,受干扰林分和对照林分的类群不同。受龙卷风影响的林分步甲捕获率较低,但物种丰富度明显高于对照林分。与对照林分相比,它们中欧洲物种个体、大型食肉类动物个体以及森林和短翅物种个体的比例较低。观察到的SPC和MIB的降低以及回归距离的增加可能表明步甲类群尚未从龙卷风造成的干扰中开始恢复。步甲类群显然分两步对龙卷风做出反应。首先,前三年的特点是指标值适度下降。其次,在龙卷风后的第四至第六年,许多观察到的变化变得更加明显。在随后的六年中,我们没有观察到森林步甲类群恢复的明显信号。