• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在年龄大于 65 岁的 2 型糖尿病患者中,自我滴定的双相门冬胰岛素 70/30 的疗效和耐受性:INITIATEplus 试验的一项探索性事后亚分析。

Efficacy and tolerability of self-titrated biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 in patients aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes: an exploratory post hoc subanalysis of the INITIATEplus trial.

机构信息

Associates in Internal Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2011 Jul;33(7):874-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.05.093. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.05.093
PMID:21741089
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Initiation of Insulin to reach A1C Target (INITIATEplus) trial studied the effect of self-titrating biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (BiAsp 30) twice daily during 24 weeks in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes who were poorly controlled by oral medication, and originally randomized according to frequency of dietary counseling interventions.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (BIAsp 30, NovoLog Mix 70/30) in INITIATEplus patients ≤65 versus >65 years old, irrespective of dietary counseling frequency, and to test the hypothesis that self-titrating BIAsp 30 in patients >65 years old could be well-tolerated and effective in this age group.

METHODS

An exploratory post hoc subanalysis, using standard statistical methods, was performed on patients stratified according to age. Data collected from 3492 patients in the intent-to-treat population who were ≤65 years old and 716 patients who were >65 years old compared glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and plasma glucose changes from baseline. Hypoglycemia rates and adverse event (AE) incidence were compared for the tolerability population of 4007 patients ≤65 years old and 805 patients >65 years old.

RESULTS

Baseline-adjusted HbA(1c) changes for patients ≤65 versus >65 years old were -2.38% versus -2.73% (P < 0.0001), with final HbA(1c) achieving 7.55% and 7.06%, respectively. Thirty-nine percent of patients ≤65 years old achieved HbA(1c) ≤7% compared with 51% of patients >65 years old. Baseline-adjusted fasting plasma glucose decreases were greater for the >65 year old population (85.2 vs 91.2 mg/dL; P = 0.004; ≤65 vs >65 years old, respectively). Minor hypoglycemia was reported in 9.7% and 7.7% of patients ≤65 versus >65 years old, respectively (0.52 vs 0.41 episodes per patient per year [ppy]; P = 0.01). Major hypoglycemia occurred in 1.5% and 3.1% of patients (0.05 vs 0.14 episodes ppy, ≤65 vs >65 years old, respectively; P < 0.0001). Nocturnal major hypoglycemia was reported for 0.4% and 0.6% of patients (P = 0.0028), whereas nocturnal minor hypoglycemia was reported for 3.8% and 2.6% (P = 0.007) of patients ≤65 and >65 years old, respectively. AEs were reported for 24% and 28% of patients ≤65 and >65 years old, respectively, serious AEs were reported for 4% and 9% of patients, respectively, and AE-related withdrawals were reported for 1.3% and 2% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-titrated biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 was found to be well-tolerated and effective in type 2 diabetes patients >65 years old, as well as in patients ≤65 years old. HbA(1c) and fasting plasma glucose decreases were significantly (P < 0.05) higher for patients >65 years old versus patients ≤65 years old. Tolerability was indicated by major and minor hypoglycemia rates at or below <0.5 episodes ppy in both age groups. Overall rates of AE and serious AEs were higher among patients > 65 years; withdrawals related to AEs were 2% compared with 1.3% in the younger age group.

摘要

背景

胰岛素起始达标研究(INITIATEplus)旨在研究在口服药物控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中,每日两次给予门冬胰岛素 70/30 预混制剂(BiAsp 30)的自我滴定效果,这些患者为胰岛素初治者,试验最初根据膳食咨询干预的频率随机分组。

目的

本研究旨在比较在 INITIATEplus 患者中,不论膳食咨询干预的频率如何,每日两次给予门冬胰岛素 70/30(BIAsp 30,诺和锐 30)的疗效和耐受性,并且验证在年龄>65 岁的患者中自我滴定 BIAsp 30 是安全且有效的假设。

方法

对按年龄分层的意向治疗人群中的 3492 例≤65 岁和 716 例>65 岁患者进行探索性事后亚组分析,采用标准统计方法,评估糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和从基线的血浆葡萄糖变化。对 4007 例≤65 岁和 805 例>65 岁的可耐受人群进行低血糖发生率和不良事件(AE)发生率的比较。

结果

≤65 岁与>65 岁患者的基线调整后 HbA1c 变化分别为-2.38%和-2.73%(P<0.0001),最终 HbA1c 分别达到 7.55%和 7.06%。39%的≤65 岁患者达到 HbA1c≤7%,而>65 岁患者为 51%。>65 岁患者的空腹血浆葡萄糖降低更显著(85.2 与 91.2 mg/dL;P=0.004;≤65 与>65 岁,分别)。≤65 岁与>65 岁患者的低血糖发生率分别为 9.7%和 7.7%(0.52 与 0.41 例次/患者/年;P=0.01)。低血糖发生率分别为 1.5%和 3.1%(0.05 与 0.14 例次/患者/年;P<0.0001)。分别有 0.4%和 0.6%的患者报告夜间严重低血糖(P=0.0028),而夜间轻微低血糖发生率分别为 3.8%和 2.6%(P=0.007)。≤65 岁和>65 岁患者的 AEs 发生率分别为 24%和 28%,严重 AEs 发生率分别为 4%和 9%,AE 相关停药率分别为 1.3%和 2%。

结论

在年龄>65 岁和≤65 岁的 2 型糖尿病患者中,自我滴定的门冬胰岛素 70/30 被证明是安全且有效的,与≤65 岁患者相比,>65 岁患者的 HbA1c 和空腹血浆葡萄糖降低更显著(P<0.05)。在两个年龄组中,低血糖发生率均<0.5 例次/患者/年,提示具有良好的耐受性。>65 岁患者的 AE 和严重 AE 发生率较高,与 AE 相关的停药率为 2%,而在年轻患者中为 1.3%。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and tolerability of self-titrated biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 in patients aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes: an exploratory post hoc subanalysis of the INITIATEplus trial.在年龄大于 65 岁的 2 型糖尿病患者中,自我滴定的双相门冬胰岛素 70/30 的疗效和耐受性:INITIATEplus 试验的一项探索性事后亚分析。
Clin Ther. 2011 Jul;33(7):874-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.05.093. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
2
Comparison of biphasic insulin aspart 30 given three times daily or twice daily in combination with metformin versus oral antidiabetic drugs alone in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a 16-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial conducted in russia.在俄罗斯进行的一项为期16周的随机、开放标签、平行组试验:比较每日三次或每日两次给予门冬胰岛素30联合二甲双胍与单用口服抗糖尿病药物治疗2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2374-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.017.
3
Efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 in type 2 diabetes patients of different race or ethnicity (INITIATEplus trial).在不同种族或民族的 2 型糖尿病患者中使用门冬胰岛素 70/30 双时相的疗效和安全性(INITIATEplus 试验)。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jul;28(7):1203-11. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.686444. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
4
Attainment of glycaemic goals in type 2 diabetes with once-, twice-, or thrice-daily dosing with biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (The 1-2-3 study).使用门冬胰岛素 70/30 每日一次、两次或三次给药实现 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖目标(1-2-3 研究)
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006 Jan;8(1):58-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2005.00563.x.
5
Risk for nocturnal hypoglycemia with biphasic insulin aspart 30 compared with biphasic human insulin 30 in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.与双相人胰岛素30相比,门冬胰岛素30双相制剂治疗2型糖尿病成人患者夜间低血糖的风险:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Ther. 2009 Aug;31(8):1641-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.011.
6
A(1c) control in a primary care setting: self-titrating an insulin analog pre-mix (INITIATEplus trial).初级保健环境中的A(1c)对照:自行滴定胰岛素类似物预混剂(INITIATEplus试验)
Am J Med. 2009 Nov;122(11):1043-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.12.026.
7
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素与门冬胰岛素30每日两次治疗日本2型糖尿病患者的随机对照试验
J Diabetes Investig. 2017 Mar;8(2):210-217. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12569. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
8
Addition of biphasic insulin aspart 30 to optimized metformin and pioglitazone treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: The ACTION Study (Achieving Control Through Insulin plus Oral ageNts).在优化的二甲双胍和吡格列酮治疗 2 型糖尿病基础上加用双相门冬胰岛素 30:ACTION 研究(通过胰岛素加口服药物实现血糖控制)
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009 Jan;11(1):27-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00796.x. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
9
Clinical effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30:70 versus biphasic human insulin 30 in UK general clinical practice: a retrospective database study.在英国常规临床实践中,双相门冬胰岛素 30/70 与双相人胰岛素 30 的临床疗效比较:一项回顾性数据库研究。
Clin Ther. 2011 Jan;33(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.01.023.
10
Predictors of achieving HbA(1c) <7% and no hypoglycaemia 6 months after initiation of biphasic insulin aspart 30 in patients with type 2 diabetes in the IMPROVE study.在 IMPROVE 研究中,对于接受预混门冬胰岛素 30 治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者,治疗 6 个月后达到 HbA1c<7%且无低血糖的预测因素。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Jun;29(6):601-9. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.786692. Epub 2013 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
EADSG Guidelines: Insulin Therapy in Diabetes.欧洲糖尿病研究学会指南:糖尿病的胰岛素治疗
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Apr;9(2):449-492. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0384-6. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
2
Effects of Age on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Insulin Detemir: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the PREDICTIVE™ 303 Study.年龄对接受地特胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:PREDICTIVE™ 303研究的事后分析
Drugs Aging. 2016 Feb;33(2):135-41. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0342-9.
3
Drug-related risk of severe hypoglycaemia in observational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
观察性研究中与药物相关的严重低血糖风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2015 Oct 12;15:57. doi: 10.1186/s12902-015-0052-z.
4
Ten years of experience with biphasic insulin aspart 30: from drug development to the latest clinical findings.双相门冬胰岛素 30 治疗十年:从药物研发到最新临床发现。
Drugs. 2012 Jul 30;72(11):1495-520. doi: 10.2165/11635490-000000000-00000.