• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

矢状劈开截骨术推进手术后的牙齿或骨骼复发?长期随访。

Dental or skeletal relapse after sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery? Long-term follow-up.

作者信息

Moen Ketil, Wisth Per Johan, Skaale Siren, Bøe Olav Egil, Tornes Knut

机构信息

Section of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Nov;69(11):e461-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.086. Epub 2011 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.086
PMID:21741141
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short- and long-term stability of mandibular advancement surgery with sagittal split osteotomy (SSO), and to investigate when relapse occurs and identify variables contributing to relapse.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients with Class II anomalies were included; the mean age at surgery was 33.0 years. All underwent SSO surgery and clinical and radiologic follow-up at 8 weeks, 1 year, and 13 years. Model analysis, cephalometric analysis, and clinical examinations were performed at each control.

RESULTS

Mean overjet relapse from 8 weeks to 13 years was 2.3 mm (range, 0 to 7.0 mm). Between 8 weeks and 1 year, mean overjet relapse was 0.6 mm (range, -1.0 to 4.0 mm), and it was 1.7 mm (range, -1.0 to 6.0 mm) between 1 year and 13 years. Overjet relapse greater than 4 mm was found in 13.9% of the patients. Mean overjet 1 year after surgery was 2.6 mm and was significantly increased compared with 8 weeks (P = .006). Mean overjet 13 years after surgery was 4.3 mm and was significantly increased compared with 1 year (P < .001). Inferior incisor line to nasion-B-point was 29.0° at 8 weeks after surgery and 25.4° at 13 years (P = .001). Insignificant changes in the other cephalometric variables were found at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

SSO advancement surgery is a relatively stable technique over time. Mean overjet relapse was found to be 2.3 mm after 13 years, following a continuous pattern over time. The cephalometric variables showed insignificant changes during follow-up, indicating that relapses are mainly of dental and not skeletal origin.

摘要

目的

评估下颌矢状劈开截骨术(SSO)进行下颌前徙手术的短期和长期稳定性,研究复发发生的时间并确定导致复发的变量。

患者与方法

纳入36例II类错颌畸形患者;手术时的平均年龄为33.0岁。所有患者均接受了SSO手术,并在术后8周、1年和13年进行了临床及影像学随访。每次复查时均进行模型分析、头影测量分析和临床检查。

结果

从8周到13年,平均覆盖复发量为2.3mm(范围为0至7.0mm)。在8周和1年之间,平均覆盖复发量为0.6mm(范围为-1.0至4.0mm),在1年和13年之间为1.7mm(范围为-1.0至6.0mm)。13.9%的患者覆盖复发量大于4mm。术后1年的平均覆盖量为2.6mm,与8周时相比显著增加(P = 0.006)。术后13年的平均覆盖量为4.3mm,与1年时相比显著增加(P < 0.001)。术后8周时,下切牙连线至鼻根点-B点为29.0°,13年时为25.4°(P = 0.001)。随访时其他头影测量变量无显著变化。

结论

随着时间推移,SSO前徙手术是一种相对稳定的技术。13年后平均覆盖复发量为2.3mm,呈随时间连续变化的模式。随访期间头影测量变量无显著变化,表明复发主要源于牙齿而非骨骼。

相似文献

1
Dental or skeletal relapse after sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery? Long-term follow-up.矢状劈开截骨术推进手术后的牙齿或骨骼复发?长期随访。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Nov;69(11):e461-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.086. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
2
Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.上颌和下颌联合手术后骨性III类错牙合的稳定性。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2001 Fall;16(3):179-92.
3
Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery.下颌前徙手术后的短期和长期骨骼复发
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Jan;35(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.04.008.
4
Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.下颌前伸术的长期稳定性:双侧矢状劈开截骨术与骨牵引成骨术。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Feb;41(2):137-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.10.031. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
5
A comparative study of skeletal and dental stability between rigid and wire fixation for mandibular advancement.下颌前徙刚性固定与钢丝固定的骨骼和牙齿稳定性对比研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Jun;117(6):638-49.
6
Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy.两种手术技术用于骨性II类错颌矫治的稳定性:矢状劈开下颌升支截骨术和下颌根尖下全牙槽骨截骨术。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Aug;120(2):134-43. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.113792.
7
Stability of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: rigid fixation versus transosseous wiring.双侧矢状劈开下颌支截骨术的稳定性:坚固内固定与骨间结扎固定的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Oct;118(4):397-403. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.108781.
8
Skeletal and dental stability of segmental distraction of the anterior mandibular alveolar process. A 2-year follow-up.下颌前牙槽骨节段性牵张成骨的骨骼和牙齿稳定性:2 年随访研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May;41(5):553-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.07.1071. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
9
Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: different long-term skeletal responses.高角和低角II类患者的下颌前徙手术:不同的长期骨骼反应。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Apr;119(4):368-81. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.110983.
10
The stability of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and vertical ramus osteotomy after bimaxillary correction of class III malocclusion.双侧矢状劈开截骨术和垂直截骨术在 III 类错颌畸形双颌矫正后的稳定性。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011 Dec;39(8):583-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of temporomandibular joint disc position and skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgery.评估双颌手术后颞下颌关节盘位置和骨骼稳定性。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Mar;28(1):137-148. doi: 10.1007/s10006-023-01161-7. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
2
Comparison of two surgical techniques (HOO vs. BSSO) for mandibular osteotomies in orthognathic surgery-a 10-year retrospective study.两种正颌外科下颌骨截骨术(HOO 与 BSSO)的比较——一项 10 年回顾性研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jun;27(2):341-351. doi: 10.1007/s10006-022-01073-y. Epub 2022 May 20.
3
Evaluation of the postoperative stability of a counter-clockwise rotation technique for skeletal class II patients by using a novel three- dimensional position-posture method.
采用新型三维位置姿势法评价骨骼 II 类患者反时钟旋转技术的术后稳定性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 13;9(1):13196. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49335-2.
4
One-year postoperative skeletal stability of 3D planned bimaxillary osteotomies: maxilla-first versus mandible-first surgery.3D 计划双颌骨截骨术后一年的骨骼稳定性:上颌骨第一手术与下颌骨第一手术。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 28;9(1):3000. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39250-x.
5
Skeletal stability following mandibular advancement: is it influenced by the magnitude of advancement or changes of the mandibular plane angle?下颌前伸后的骨骼稳定性:它是否受前伸幅度或下颌平面角变化的影响?
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;43(3):152-159. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.3.152. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
6
Comparative Study of Skeletal Stability between Postoperative Skeletal Intermaxillary Fixation and No Skeletal Fixation after Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: an 18 Months Retrospective Study.双侧矢状劈开下颌支截骨术后颌间骨固定与非骨固定的骨骼稳定性比较研究:一项18个月的回顾性研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2014 Apr 1;5(1):e2. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2014.5102. eCollection 2014 Jan.