Wolf Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Gait Posture. 2011 Jul;34(3):391-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
Although plantar pressure measurement systems are being used increasingly during gait analyses to investigate foot orthotics, there is limited information describing test-retest reliability of such measurements. Objectives of this study were to (1) examine the test-retest reliability of lateral heel pressure (LHP) and centre of pressure (COP) during walking with and without lateral heel wedges, and (2) evaluate the effects of 4° and 8° lateral heel wedges on the magnitude of LHP, the pathway of the COP and the peak external knee adduction moment (KAM) in subjects with and without knee osteoarthritis (OA). Twenty-six subjects, 12 patients with knee OA and 14 healthy subjects, were evaluated during three lateral heel wedge conditions (control, 4° and 8°) with standardized footwear. Three-dimensional analyses of gait with optical motion capture, floor-mounted force plate and in-shoe plantar pressure were completed on two occasions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(2, 1)) for LHP were excellent (0.79-0.83) while ICCs for COP in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions were more variable (0.66-0.86). Reliability was slightly diminished when using heel wedges. Standard errors of measurement suggested considerable day-to-day variability in an individual's measures. Lateral heel wedges significantly (p<0.001) increased LHP, shifted COP anteriorly and laterally, and decreased the KAM. No significant differences were observed between subjects with and without OA. Although the day-to-day variability appears too large to confidently evaluate changes in individual patients, and decreases in reliability with increases in wedge size indicate caution, these results suggest in-shoe measurement of LHP and COP are appropriate for use in studies evaluating biomechanical effects of foot orthoses for knee OA.
虽然足底压力测量系统在步态分析中越来越多地用于研究足矫形器,但关于此类测量的测试-重测信度的信息有限。本研究的目的是:(1)检测在有无侧向足跟楔形物情况下行走时侧向足跟压力(LHP)和压力中心(COP)的测试-重测信度;(2)评估 4°和 8°侧向足跟楔形物对膝骨关节炎(OA)患者和无 OA 患者的 LHP 幅度、COP 轨迹和最大膝关节内收力矩(KAM)的影响。26 名受试者(12 名膝 OA 患者和 14 名健康受试者)在三种侧向足跟楔形物条件(对照、4°和 8°)下穿着标准鞋进行了三次评估。使用光学运动捕捉、地面测力板和足底压力传感器进行了三次三维步态分析。LHP 的组内相关系数(ICC(2,1))为 0.79-0.83,而 COP 在内外和前后方向的 ICC 则更为多变(0.66-0.86)。使用足跟楔形物时,可靠性略有降低。测量误差标准表明个体测量值的日内变异性较大。侧向足跟楔形物显著增加了 LHP,使 COP 向前和向外侧移动,并降低了 KAM。在有 OA 和无 OA 的患者之间未观察到显著差异。尽管日内变异性似乎太大,无法自信地评估个体患者的变化,但随着楔形物尺寸的增加可靠性降低,这表明在评估足矫形器对膝 OA 的生物力学影响的研究中,鞋内测量 LHP 和 COP 是合适的。