• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体大脑中单词之间的语义相关性:一项事件相关电位研究。

Semantic relatedness between words in each individual brain: an event-related potential study.

机构信息

Department of Language Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan.

出版信息

Neurosci Lett. 2011 Aug 26;501(2):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.06.044. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.06.044
PMID:21741452
Abstract

The relationship between 2 words is judged by the meanings of words. Here, we examined how the semantic relatedness of words is structured in each individual brain. During measurements of event-related potentials (ERPs), participants performed semantic-relatedness judgments of word pairs. For each participant, we divided word pairs into 2 groups--related and unrelated pairs--and compared their ERPs. All of the participants showed a significant N400 effect. However, when we applied an identical grouping of pairs, this effect was observed only in half the number of the participants. These results show that our single-subject analysis of N400 extracted semantic relatedness of words in the individual brain. Future studies using this analysis will clarify the organization of the mental lexicon.

摘要

这两个词之间的关系是通过词义来判断的。在这里,我们研究了单词的语义相关性是如何在每个人的大脑中构建的。在进行事件相关电位 (ERP) 测量时,参与者对词对进行语义相关性判断。对于每个参与者,我们将词对分为两组——相关词对和不相关词对,并比较它们的 ERP。所有参与者都表现出显著的 N400 效应。然而,当我们采用相同的词对分组时,这种效应仅在一半的参与者中观察到。这些结果表明,我们对 N400 的单被试分析提取了个体大脑中单词的语义相关性。未来使用这种分析的研究将阐明心理词汇的组织。

相似文献

1
Semantic relatedness between words in each individual brain: an event-related potential study.个体大脑中单词之间的语义相关性:一项事件相关电位研究。
Neurosci Lett. 2011 Aug 26;501(2):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.06.044. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
2
Contextual modulation of N400 amplitude to lexically ambiguous words.对词汇歧义单词的N400波幅的情境调节
Brain Cogn. 2004 Aug;55(3):470-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.073.
3
An event-related potential study of the concreteness effect between Chinese nouns and verbs.一项关于汉语名词和动词具体性效应的事件相关电位研究。
Brain Res. 2009 Feb 9;1253:149-60. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.10.080. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
4
A pool of pairs of related objects (POPORO) for investigating visual semantic integration: behavioral and electrophysiological validation.用于研究视觉语义整合的相关对象对池 (POPORO):行为和电生理验证。
Brain Topogr. 2012 Jul;25(3):272-84. doi: 10.1007/s10548-011-0216-8. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
5
Meaningful physical changes mediate lexical-semantic integration: top-down and form-based bottom-up information sources interact in the N400.有意义的物理变化介导词汇语义整合:自上而下和基于形式的自下而上的信息源在 N400 中相互作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3573-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.009. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
6
Comparison of brain mechanisms underlying the processing of Chinese characters and pseudo-characters: an event-related potential study.汉字和假字加工的脑机制比较:一项事件相关电位研究。
Int J Psychol. 2010 Apr 1;45(2):102-10. doi: 10.1080/00207590903156439.
7
Knowledge inhibition and N400: a within- and a between-subjects study with distractor words.知识抑制与N400:一项关于干扰词的被试内和被试间研究。
Brain Res. 2008 Jan 2;1187:167-83. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.021. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
8
Impulsivity and semantic/emotional processing: an examination of the N400 wave.冲动性与语义/情绪加工:对N400波的研究
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Jan;120(1):85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.10.008. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
9
Hemispheric differences in strong versus weak semantic priming: evidence from event-related brain potentials.强语义启动与弱语义启动中的半球差异:来自事件相关脑电位的证据。
Brain Lang. 2007 Jan;100(1):23-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.117. Epub 2006 Sep 5.
10
To predict or not to predict: influences of task and strategy on the processing of semantic relations.预测与否:任务和策略对语义关系加工的影响
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Aug;19(8):1259-74. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1259.