Department for Research and Education, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 May;53(4):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
This study relates to the schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) proposal of the upcoming fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) by investigating the construct validity of SPD as defined by DSM-IV in a large sample of patients from the Norwegian Network of Personality-Focused Treatment Programs (N = 2619), assessed by structured diagnostic interviews and the Longitudinal, Expert All Data standard. We investigated factor structure and psychometric properties of the SPD criteria, as well as co-occurrence patterns between SPD and other PDs. Thirty-six patients were diagnosed with SPD and 513 patients (21%) endorsed at least 2 schizotypal criteria. We found that 2 factors were specific for SPD, a cognitive-perceptual factor (ideas of reference, magical thinking, and unusual perceptual experiences) and an oddness factor (odd thinking and speech, constricted affect, and odd appearance or behavior). The criteria belonging to these factors had appropriate psychometric properties. The criteria of the cognitive-perceptual factor were more strongly associated with borderline personality disorder (PD) than with the other PDs. We did not find support for a consistent factor that reflected interpersonal problems. The criteria that used to be part of this factor (suspiciousness, lack of friends or confidants, and excessive social anxiety) performed poorly as specific SPD criteria. SPD was more strongly associated with antisocial PD and paranoid PD than with the other PDs. We suggest that ideas of reference should be included explicitly under the schizotypal facet of cognitive dysregulation in DSM-5, with less emphasis on the social phobic aspects of this feature. Furthermore, there should be more emphasis on the cognitive aspects of suspiciousness in SPD, and it should be considered to split up the affectivity criterion into constricted affect and inappropriate affect, with the latter type of affect being the expression of problems with intersubjective regulation. Finally, it is suggested that interpersonal dysfunction is secondary to the 2 primary SPD factors. Therefore, the SPD narrative should start by describing eccentricity and cognitive-perceptual aberrations rather than interpersonal difficulties.
这项研究涉及即将出版的《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中的分裂型人格障碍(SPD)提案,通过对来自挪威人格聚焦治疗计划网络(N = 2619)的大量患者进行的结构诊断访谈和纵向、专家全数据标准,调查了 DSM-IV 中定义的 SPD 的构念效度。我们调查了 SPD 标准的因素结构和心理测量特性,以及 SPD 与其他 PD 之间的共病模式。36 名患者被诊断为 SPD,513 名患者(21%)至少有 2 项分裂型标准。我们发现,2 个因素是 SPD 特有的,一个是认知-知觉因素(关系妄想、魔幻思维和异常知觉体验),另一个是古怪因素(古怪的思维和言语、情感受限和古怪的外表或行为)。属于这些因素的标准具有适当的心理测量特性。认知-知觉因素的标准与边缘型人格障碍(PD)的相关性强于其他 PD。我们没有发现支持反映人际问题的一致因素的证据。过去属于这个因素的标准(多疑、没有朋友或知己、过度社交焦虑)作为特定的 SPD 标准表现不佳。SPD 与反社会型 PD 和偏执型 PD 的相关性强于其他 PD。我们建议,在 DSM-5 中,应将关系妄想明确归入认知失调的分裂型方面,减少对该特征社交恐惧症方面的强调。此外,应更加强调 SPD 中多疑的认知方面,并考虑将情感标准分为情感受限和不适当情感,后者是主体间调节问题的表现。最后,建议人际功能障碍是 SPD 的两个主要因素的次要因素。因此,SPD 的叙述应该从描述古怪和认知知觉异常开始,而不是从人际困难开始。