Suppr超能文献

内脏和肾动脉动脉瘤的血管内治疗。

Endovascular treatment of visceral and renal artery aneurysms.

机构信息

Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Florida 33176, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Sep;22(9):1246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jul 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze early and midterm results of endovascular treatment of visceral aneurysms regarding technical considerations, technical success rate, aneurysm rupture, and end-organ ischemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Endovascular treatment of 41 visceral and renal artery aneurysms (VAAs) in 40 consecutive patients (25 women; mean age, 59.4 y ± 16.2) was retrospectively reviewed. The series included 30 true aneurysms and 11 pseudoaneurysms in renal (n = 17), splenic (n = 13), hepatic (n = 4), celiac (n = 4), gastroduodenal (n = 2), and middle colic (n = 1) arteries. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-one aneurysms underwent endovascular treatment. Hypertension (73%) and hyperlipidemia (32%) were the most common associated comorbidities. Nineteen patients presented with symptoms of pain (15%) or rupture (32%) in 10 pseudoaneurysms (91%) and nine true aneurysms (30%; P = .0007). The most commonly used technique (93%) was coil embolization with (15%) or without (78%) other endovascular agents. The rate of technical success (cessation of hemorrhage or blood flow into aneurysm sac) was 98%. There was no periprocedural mortality. Mean hospital stays were 1 and 2 days for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, respectively. Mean clinical follow-up was 44.5 months; mean imaging follow-up was 11.7 months. The only complication was an intraprocedural thromboembolic event in one case (3%). Follow-up imaging evidence of end-organ partial infarct was detected in six patients (21%), with no clinical evidence of organ insufficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment of VAAs is a safe and highly successful procedure. Associated side effects such as distal embolization and end-organ infarcts were not found to be clinically significant.

摘要

目的

分析内脏动脉瘤(VAAs)血管内治疗的早期和中期结果,包括技术考虑、技术成功率、动脉瘤破裂和终末器官缺血。

材料和方法

回顾性分析 40 例连续患者(25 例女性;平均年龄 59.4 ± 16.2 岁)41 个内脏和肾动脉动脉瘤(VAAs)的血管内治疗。该系列包括肾动脉(n = 17)、脾动脉(n = 13)、肝动脉(n = 4)、腹腔动脉(n = 4)、胃十二指肠动脉(n = 2)和中结肠动脉(n = 1)的 30 个真性动脉瘤和 11 个假性动脉瘤。分析了人口统计学、临床、程序和随访数据。

结果

41 个动脉瘤接受了血管内治疗。高血压(73%)和高脂血症(32%)是最常见的合并症。19 例患者有疼痛症状(15%)或 10 个假性动脉瘤中的破裂症状(91%)和 9 个真性动脉瘤中的破裂症状(30%;P =.0007)。最常用的技术(93%)是线圈栓塞,联合(15%)或不联合(78%)其他血管内药物。技术成功率(停止出血或血流进入动脉瘤囊)为 98%。无围手术期死亡。无症状和有症状患者的平均住院时间分别为 1 天和 2 天。平均临床随访 44.5 个月;平均影像学随访 11.7 个月。唯一的并发症是 1 例(3%)术中血栓栓塞事件。6 例(21%)患者发现终末器官部分梗死的影像学证据,但无器官功能不全的临床证据。

结论

VAAs 的血管内治疗是一种安全且非常成功的方法。未发现与治疗相关的副作用,如远端栓塞和终末器官梗死,对临床没有明显影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验