Internal Medicine Program, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Crit Care Clin. 2011 Jul;27(3):487-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2011.04.006.
In the last 2 decades, our goals for mechanical ventilatory support in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or acute lung injury (ALI) have changed dramatically. Several randomized controlled trials have built on a substantial body of preclinical work to demonstrate that the way in which we employ mechanical ventilation has an impact on important patient outcomes. Avoiding ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is now a major focus when clinicians are considering which ventilatory strategy to employ in patients with ALI/ARDS. Physicians are searching for methods that may further limit VILI, while still achieving adequate gas exchange.
在过去的 20 年中,我们对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)或急性肺损伤(ALI)患者机械通气支持的目标发生了巨大变化。几项随机对照试验在大量临床前工作的基础上进行,证明了我们使用机械通气的方式对患者的重要结局有影响。避免呼吸机相关性肺损伤(VILI)现在是临床医生在考虑为 ALI/ARDS 患者采用哪种通气策略时的主要关注点。医生们正在寻找可能进一步限制 VILI 同时仍能实现充分气体交换的方法。