Neild Guy H, Oygar D Deren, Hmida Mohamed Ben
UCL Centre for Nephrology, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2011 Jul;22(4):651-61.
We reviewed the regional data on primary renal disease (PRD) causing end-stage renal failure (ESRF) during the decade 2000-2009. Reporting was generally inconsistent and diagnostic groups were poorly defined. We propose a system in which all diagnoses fall into one of eight broad groups: ESRF of uncertain etiology, congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) and acquired uropathy, glomerular diseases, tubulo-interstitial disease (TID), other congenital and familial diseases, diabetes, renovascular disease and other specified diagnoses. Each group has sub-headings; for instance, primary glomerulonephritis, secondary glomerulonephritis, and hereditary glomerular disease. For each sub-heading, there is a list of specific diagnoses similar to that used by the European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EDTA) and United States Renal Data System (USRDS) coding systems. We also recommend that "etiology unknown" group should be reported in more detail as either "glomerular phenotype" or "tubular phenotype" and careful attention be paid to evidence for a family history of renal disease. To improve reporting, all patients who are diabetic, and all who have evidence of familial inheritance, should be recorded and a diagnostic category should be chosen. Thus, a diabetic patient is designated as "diabetic nephropathy" only if he/she fulfils the case definition for that diagnosis. We believe that the collection can be done much better as exemplified by the pediatric community, where data collection is very consistent, and there is a low rate of "unknown disease".
我们回顾了2000年至2009年这十年间导致终末期肾衰竭(ESRF)的原发性肾病(PRD)的区域数据。报告情况普遍不一致,诊断分组定义不明确。我们提出了一个系统,其中所有诊断可分为八大类之一:病因不明的ESRF、肾脏和尿路先天性异常(CAKUT)及后天性泌尿系统疾病、肾小球疾病、肾小管间质疾病(TID)、其他先天性和家族性疾病、糖尿病、肾血管疾病以及其他特定诊断。每个大类都有小标题;例如,原发性肾小球肾炎、继发性肾小球肾炎和遗传性肾小球疾病。对于每个小标题,都有一份类似于欧洲透析与移植协会(EDTA)和美国肾脏数据系统(USRDS)编码系统所使用的特定诊断清单。我们还建议,“病因不明”组应更详细地报告为“肾小球表型”或“肾小管表型”,并应密切关注肾病家族史的证据。为了改进报告,所有糖尿病患者以及所有有家族遗传证据的患者都应进行记录并选择诊断类别。因此,糖尿病患者只有在符合该诊断的病例定义时才被指定为“糖尿病肾病”。我们相信,数据收集工作可以做得更好,儿科领域就是一个例子,那里的数据收集非常一致,“病因不明疾病”的发生率很低。