Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;47(5):1440-7. doi: 10.1037/a0024464.
Speeded enumeration of visual stimuli typically produces a bilinear function, with a shallow subitizing rate (<100 ms/item) up to 3-4 items (subitizing span) and a steeper counting rate (~300 ms/item) thereafter. FINST theory (L. M. Trick & Z. W. Pylyshyn, 1993, 1994) suggests that subitizing of targets is possible in the presence of distractors if attention is not required for target detection, but this has not been tested in children. The present study explored enumeration without distractors (Os alone) and with distractors (Os among Xs) in 35 children aged 6-11 years and 17 adults. Subitizing span increased significantly from childhood to adulthood, and counting rate increased significantly with age. Bilinear functions were significantly better than linear fits to the data for most children and adults both without distractors (97% and 100%, respectively) and with distractors (89% and 94%), consistent with their efficient visual search for a single O among multiple Xs. These findings are discussed in comparison with those from new modeling of earlier enumeration data from young and older adults, revealing striking asymmetries in subitizing with distractors between development and aging.
快速枚举视觉刺激通常会产生一个双线性函数,在 3-4 个项目(亚比茨跨度)之前,有一个较浅的亚比茨率(<100 毫秒/项目),之后是一个更陡峭的计数率(~300 毫秒/项目)。FINST 理论(L.M.Trick 和 Z.W.Pylyshyn,1993 年,1994 年)表明,如果目标检测不需要注意力,那么在存在干扰物的情况下也可以对目标进行亚比茨计数,但这在儿童中尚未得到验证。本研究在 35 名 6-11 岁的儿童和 17 名成年人中探索了没有干扰物(只有 Os)和有干扰物(在 Xs 中存在 Os)的计数。亚比茨跨度从儿童期到成年期显著增加,计数率随着年龄的增长显著增加。对于大多数儿童和成年人来说,双线性函数都明显优于线性拟合,无论是在没有干扰物的情况下(分别为 97%和 100%)还是在有干扰物的情况下(分别为 89%和 94%),这与他们在多个 Xs 中高效搜索单个 O 是一致的。这些发现与早期对年轻和年长成年人的计数数据进行新建模的结果进行了比较,揭示了在有干扰物的情况下,发展和衰老之间亚比茨的惊人不对称性。