Suppr超能文献

β-痕迹蛋白是否是肝移植受者肾小球滤过率的替代标志物?

Is beta-trace protein an alternative marker of glomerular filtration rate in liver transplant recipients?

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Liver Int. 2011 Oct;31(9):1345-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02569.x. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Renal insufficiency is common after liver transplantation (LT). The use of creatinine (Crea) as a marker of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is limited in patients after LT. Beta-trace protein (BTP), an alternative marker of GFR, is independent of muscle mass and has not been evaluated in LT recipients.

AIM

To evaluate BTP as an alternative tool to monitor renal function in LT recipients.

METHODS

We determined the diagnostic performance of BTP in comparison to Crea and cystatin C (CysC) in 52 patients, who concomitantly underwent (99m)Tc-DTPA-clearance measurements. Furthermore, we evaluated bias, precision and accuracy of five recently developed BTP-based equations to estimate GFR.

RESULTS

The average measured GFR was 51 (46.1; 56.0) ml/min/1.73 m(2). Using a cut-off of 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) the area under the curve (AUC) was nearly identical for all markers. At a decision point of 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) BTP showed only a trend towards a higher AUC compared with Crea and CysC (0.806 vs. 0.754 and 0.760, respectively; P>0.2). In comparison to the modification of diet in renal disease-formula (MDRD) only one of five BTP-based equations displayed a significantly higher accuracy within 30% of the measured GFR (84.6 vs. 59.6%; P=0.006). None of these equations showed a significant improvement compared with MDRD with respect to bias and precision.

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-trace protein can be used as an alternative diagnostic tool to detect moderate or severe GFR reduction in patients after LT. Furthermore BTP-based equations are able to estimate GFR in LT recipients. However, these equations fail to perform constantly better than the MDRD formula.

摘要

背景

肾功能不全在肝移植(LT)后很常见。在 LT 患者中,肌酐(Crea)作为肾小球滤过率(GFR)标志物的应用受到限制。β-痕迹蛋白(BTP)是 GFR 的替代标志物,与肌肉质量无关,尚未在 LT 受者中进行评估。

目的

评估 BTP 作为 LT 受者监测肾功能的替代工具。

方法

我们在 52 例同时进行(99m)Tc-DTPA 清除率测量的患者中,比较了 BTP 与 Crea 和胱抑素 C(CysC)的诊断性能。此外,我们评估了最近开发的五种基于 BTP 的方程来估计 GFR 的偏差、精度和准确性。

结果

平均测量的 GFR 为 51(46.1;56.0)ml/min/1.73 m(2)。使用 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2)的截止值,所有标志物的曲线下面积(AUC)几乎相同。在 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)的决策点,BTP 与 Crea 和 CysC 相比仅显示出更高 AUC 的趋势(分别为 0.806、0.754 和 0.760;P>0.2)。与改良肾脏病饮食公式(MDRD)相比,只有五种基于 BTP 的方程中的一种显示出在测量 GFR 的 30%范围内具有更高的准确性(84.6 与 59.6%;P=0.006)。与 MDRD 相比,这些方程在偏差和精度方面均未显示出显著改善。

结论

BTP 可作为检测 LT 后患者中中度或重度 GFR 降低的替代诊断工具。此外,基于 BTP 的方程能够估计 LT 受者的 GFR。然而,这些方程在性能上并未始终优于 MDRD 公式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验