Department of Forensic Pathology, College of Forensic Medicine, Henan University of Science and Technology, 31 Anhui Road, Jianxi District, Luoyang, Henan 471003, People's Republic of China.
Mutagenesis. 2011 Sep;26(5):667-73. doi: 10.1093/mutage/ger032. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
DNA mismatch repair, known as a fundamentally biological pathway, plays key roles in maintaining genomic stability, eliminating mismatch bases and preventing both mutagenesis in the short term and cancerogenesis in the long term. Polymorphisms of MLH1 in individuals may have an effect on the DNA repair capacity and therefore on cancer risk. Recently, emerging studies have been done to evaluate the association between MLH1 -93 G/A polymorphism and cancer risk in diverse populations. However, the results remain conflicting rather than conclusive. In this meta-analysis, we assessed reported studies of association between the MLH1 -93 G/A polymorphism and cancer risk including 13 691 cancer cases and 14 068 controls from 17 published studies. A borderline significant association between the MLH1 -93 G/A polymorphism and cancer risk was observed in overall analysis [heterozygote: odds ratio (OR) = 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.26; homozygote: OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.40; dominant model: OR = 1.13; 95% CI 1.01-1.26; recessive model: OR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.07-1.35, respectively]. In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risks were found in Asian population and mixed population but not in Caucasian population. After stratified analysis according to the quality of literature, increased cancer risks were observed in the studies of lower quality but not in the studies of higher quality. Similarly, elevated cancer risks were observed in hospital-based studies but not in population-based studies. These findings showed no persuasive evidence that MLH1 -93 G/A polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of cancer. On the conservative standpoint, well-designed population-based studies with larger sample size in different ethnic groups should be performed to further confirm these results.
DNA 错配修复是一种基本的生物学途径,在维持基因组稳定性、消除错配碱基以及预防短期的突变和长期的癌变方面发挥着关键作用。个体中 MLH1 的多态性可能会影响 DNA 修复能力,从而影响癌症风险。最近,已经有一些新兴的研究评估了 MLH1-93G/A 多态性与不同人群癌症风险之间的关联。然而,结果仍然存在争议,而不是结论性的。在这项荟萃分析中,我们评估了 17 项已发表研究报告的 MLH1-93G/A 多态性与癌症风险之间的关联,包括 13691 例癌症病例和 14068 例对照。总体分析显示,MLH1-93G/A 多态性与癌症风险之间存在边缘显著相关性[杂合子:比值比(OR)=1.15;95%置信区间(CI)1.05-1.26;纯合子:OR=1.21;95%CI,1.04-1.40;显性模型:OR=1.13;95%CI,1.01-1.26;隐性模型:OR=1.21;95%CI,1.07-1.35]。按种族亚组分析,在亚洲人群和混合人群中发现风险显著增加,但在高加索人群中未发现。根据文献质量进行分层分析后,在质量较低的研究中观察到癌症风险增加,但在质量较高的研究中未观察到。同样,在基于医院的研究中观察到癌症风险升高,但在基于人群的研究中未观察到。这些发现没有令人信服的证据表明 MLH1-93G/A 多态性与癌症风险增加有关。从保守的角度来看,应该在不同种族群体中进行设计良好的基于人群的研究,以进一步证实这些结果。