Suppr超能文献

UNG 启动的碱基切除修复是 DNA 中 5-氟尿嘧啶的主要修复途径,但 5-氟尿嘧啶的细胞毒性主要取决于 RNA 的掺入。

UNG-initiated base excision repair is the major repair route for 5-fluorouracil in DNA, but 5-fluorouracil cytotoxicity depends mainly on RNA incorporation.

机构信息

Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7489 Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Oct;39(19):8430-44. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr563. Epub 2011 Jul 10.

Abstract

Cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil (FU) and 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUrd) due to DNA fragmentation during DNA repair has been proposed as an alternative to effects from thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibition or RNA incorporation. The goal of the present study was to investigate the relative contribution of the proposed mechanisms for cytotoxicity of 5-fluoropyrimidines. We demonstrate that in human cancer cells, base excision repair (BER) initiated by the uracil-DNA glycosylase UNG is the major route for FU-DNA repair in vitro and in vivo. SMUG1, TDG and MBD4 contributed modestly in vitro and not detectably in vivo. Contribution from mismatch repair was limited to FU:G contexts at best. Surprisingly, knockdown of individual uracil-DNA glycosylases or MSH2 did not affect sensitivity to FU or FdUrd. Inhibitors of common steps of BER or DNA damage signalling affected sensitivity to FdUrd and HmdUrd, but not to FU. In support of predominantly RNA-mediated cytotoxicity, FU-treated cells accumulated ~3000- to 15 000-fold more FU in RNA than in DNA. Moreover, FU-cytotoxicity was partially reversed by ribonucleosides, but not deoxyribonucleosides and FU displayed modest TS-inhibition compared to FdUrd. In conclusion, UNG-initiated BER is the major route for FU-DNA repair, but cytotoxicity of FU is predominantly RNA-mediated, while DNA-mediated effects are limited to FdUrd.

摘要

氟尿嘧啶(FU)和 5-氟-2'-脱氧尿苷(FdUrd)的细胞毒性归因于 DNA 修复过程中的 DNA 片段化,这被认为是替代胸苷酸合成酶(TS)抑制或 RNA 掺入的一种方法。本研究的目的是研究 5-氟嘧啶类药物细胞毒性的拟议机制的相对贡献。我们证明,在人类癌细胞中,由尿嘧啶-DNA 糖基化酶 UNG 启动的碱基切除修复(BER)是体外和体内 FU-DNA 修复的主要途径。SMUG1、TDG 和 MBD4 在体外的贡献不大,在体内也无法检测到。错配修复的贡献最多也仅限于 FU:G 背景。令人惊讶的是,单个尿嘧啶-DNA 糖基化酶或 MSH2 的敲低并不影响对 FU 或 FdUrd 的敏感性。BER 或 DNA 损伤信号转导的常见步骤抑制剂会影响对 FdUrd 和 HmdUrd 的敏感性,但不会影响对 FU 的敏感性。支持主要由 RNA 介导的细胞毒性,FU 处理的细胞在 RNA 中积累的 FU 比在 DNA 中多 3000-15000 倍。此外,核糖核苷部分逆转了 FU 的细胞毒性,但脱氧核糖核苷不能逆转,与 FdUrd 相比,FU 对 TS 的抑制作用较小。总之,UNG 启动的 BER 是 FU-DNA 修复的主要途径,但 FU 的细胞毒性主要是由 RNA 介导的,而 DNA 介导的作用仅限于 FdUrd。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21a8/3201877/9f87f84c8290/gkr563f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验