• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pharmacokinetics and virological efficacy after switch to once-daily lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected children.在有治疗经验的 HIV-1 感染儿童中,转换为每日一次洛匹那韦利托那韦后的药代动力学和病毒学疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Sep;55(9):4320-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00166-11. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
2
Sustained Viral Suppression in HIV-infected Children on Once-daily Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Clinical Practice.临床实践中接受每日一次洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗的HIV感染儿童实现持续病毒抑制
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Oct;36(10):976-980. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001627.
3
A lopinavir/ritonavir-based once-daily regimen results in better compliance and is non-inferior to a twice-daily regimen through 96 weeks.基于洛匹那韦/利托那韦的每日一次治疗方案可带来更好的依从性,并且在96周内不劣于每日两次的治疗方案。
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2007 Dec;23(12):1505-14. doi: 10.1089/aid.2007.0107.
4
Optimisation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected children under 3 years of age.3岁以下HIV感染儿童抗逆转录病毒疗法的优化
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 22;2014(5):CD004772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004772.pub4.
5
Once- versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir tablets in virologically suppressed, HIV-infected, treatment-experienced children: comparative pharmacokinetics and virological outcome after switching to once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir.在病毒学抑制的、感染 HIV 的、有治疗经验的儿童中,每日一次与每日两次洛匹那韦/利托那韦片剂:转换为每日一次洛匹那韦/利托那韦后的比较药代动力学和病毒学结果。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Dec;67(12):2927-31. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks332. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
6
Effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected children under 2 years of age.抗逆转录病毒疗法对2岁以下感染艾滋病毒儿童的疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11(7):CD004772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004772.pub3.
7
Efavirenz-based simplification after successful early lopinavir-boosted-ritonavir-based therapy in HIV-infected children in Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire: the MONOD ANRS 12206 non-inferiority randomised trial.布基纳法索和科特迪瓦艾滋病毒感染儿童在基于洛匹那韦增强型利托那韦的早期治疗成功后基于依非韦伦的简化治疗:MONOD ANRS 12206非劣效性随机试验
BMC Med. 2017 Apr 24;15(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0842-4.
8
Sex differences in responses to antiretroviral treatment in South African HIV-infected children on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir- and nevirapine-based treatment.南非感染 HIV 的儿童在接受利托那韦增效洛匹那韦和奈韦拉平治疗时,抗逆转录病毒治疗反应的性别差异。
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Feb 12;14:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-39.
9
Pharmacokinetics of high-dose lopinavir-ritonavir with and without saquinavir or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in human immunodeficiency virus-infected pediatric and adolescent patients previously treated with protease inhibitors.在先前接受蛋白酶抑制剂治疗的人类免疫缺陷病毒感染的儿童和青少年患者中,高剂量洛匹那韦-利托那韦联合或不联合沙奎那韦或非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂的药代动力学。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Sep;52(9):3276-83. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00224-08. Epub 2008 Jul 14.
10
Tipranavir/Ritonavir (500/200 mg and 500/100 mg) Was Virologically Non-Inferior to Lopinavir/Ritonavir (400/100 mg) at Week 48 in Treatment-Naïve HIV-1-Infected Patients: A Randomized, Multinational, Multicenter Trial.替拉那韦/利托那韦(500/200毫克和500/100毫克)在初治的HIV-1感染患者中,第48周时病毒学疗效不劣于洛匹那韦/利托那韦(400/100毫克):一项随机、多国、多中心试验。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0144917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144917. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Pregnancy on Unbound Raltegravir Concentrations in the ANRS 160 RalFe Trial.妊娠对ANRS 160 RalFe试验中未结合的拉替拉韦浓度的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Sep 21;64(10). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00759-20.
2
Optimizing Pediatric Dosing Recommendations and Treatment Management of Antiretroviral Drugs Using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Data in Children Living With HIV.利用治疗药物监测数据优化儿童抗逆转录病毒药物的给药建议和治疗管理,以治疗 HIV 感染者。
Ther Drug Monit. 2019 Aug;41(4):431-443. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000637.
3
Lopinavir serum concentrations of critically ill infants: a pharmacokinetic investigation in South Africa.危重症婴儿洛匹那韦血清浓度:南非的一项药代动力学研究。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2018 Nov;207(5-6):339-343. doi: 10.1007/s00430-018-0550-5. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
4
Once vs. twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected children.在感染HIV-1的儿童中,洛匹那韦/利托那韦每日一次与每日两次的对比研究。
AIDS. 2015 Nov 28;29(18):2447-57. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000862.
5
Population approach to analyze the pharmacokinetics of free and total lopinavir in HIV-infected pregnant women and consequences for dose adjustment.采用群体方法分析HIV感染孕妇中游离洛匹那韦和总洛匹那韦的药代动力学及其对剂量调整的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Sep;59(9):5727-35. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00863-15. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
6
Maternal and fetal zidovudine pharmacokinetics during pregnancy and labour: too high dose infused at labour?孕期及分娩期间母婴齐多夫定的药代动力学:分娩时输注剂量过高?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Dec;78(6):1387-96. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12459.
7
Population pharmacokinetics study of recommended zidovudine doses in HIV-1-infected children.推荐的齐多夫定剂量在 HIV-1 感染儿童中的群体药代动力学研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Oct;57(10):4801-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00911-13. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
8
When to start, what to start and other treatment controversies in pediatric HIV infection.何时开始、用什么药物开始以及儿科 HIV 感染的其他治疗争议。
Paediatr Drugs. 2012 Dec 1;14(6):361-76. doi: 10.2165/11599640-000000000-00000.
9
Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir crushed versus whole tablets in children.洛匹那韦利托那韦的药代动力学:粉碎与整片制剂在儿童中的比较。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011 Dec 1;58(4):385-91. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318232b057.

本文引用的文献

1
Similar safety and efficacy of once- and twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir tablets in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected subjects at 48 weeks.在 48 周时,每日一次和每日两次洛匹那韦/利托那韦片剂治疗经验丰富的 HIV-1 感染患者的安全性和疗效相似。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Jun;54(2):143-51. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181cbd21e.
2
Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of once- versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir treatment in HIV-1-infected children.在HIV-1感染儿童中,洛匹那韦/利托那韦每日一次与每日两次治疗的药代动力学及耐受性
Antivir Ther. 2009;14(4):603-6.
3
Population pharmacokinetics of lopinavir predict suboptimal therapeutic concentrations in treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus-infected children.洛匹那韦的群体药代动力学表明,在有治疗经验的人类免疫缺陷病毒感染儿童中,治疗浓度可能未达最佳水平。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Jun;53(6):2532-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01374-08. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
4
Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir in HIV type-1-infected children taking the new tablet formulation once daily.洛匹那韦在每日服用新型片剂制剂的1型HIV感染儿童中的药代动力学。
Antivir Ther. 2008;13(8):1087-90.
5
Computing normalised prediction distribution errors to evaluate nonlinear mixed-effect models: the npde add-on package for R.计算归一化预测分布误差以评估非线性混合效应模型:用于R的npde附加包。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008 May;90(2):154-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
6
Mechanism-based concepts of size and maturity in pharmacokinetics.药代动力学中基于机制的大小和成熟度概念。
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;48:303-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094708.
7
High-dose lopinavir/ritonavir in highly treatment-experienced HIV-1 patients: efficacy, safety, and predictors of response.高剂量洛匹那韦/利托那韦用于治疗经验丰富的HIV-1患者:疗效、安全性及反应预测因素
HIV Clin Trials. 2007 Jul-Aug;8(4):193-204. doi: 10.1310/hct0804-193.
8
Lopinavir/Ritonavir pharmacokinetic profile: impact of sex and other covariates following a change from twice-daily to once-daily therapy.洛匹那韦/利托那韦药代动力学特征:从每日两次治疗改为每日一次治疗后性别及其他协变量的影响
J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Aug;47(8):970-7. doi: 10.1177/0091270007302564. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
9
A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen provides noninferior antiviral activity compared with a twice-daily regimen.与每日两次给药方案相比,每日一次的洛匹那韦/利托那韦方案具有非劣效的抗病毒活性。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006 Oct 1;43(2):153-60. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000242449.67155.1a.
10
Population analysis of weight-, age-, and sex-related differences in the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir in children from birth to 18 years.对出生至18岁儿童洛匹那韦药代动力学中体重、年龄和性别相关差异的群体分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Nov;50(11):3548-55. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00943-05. Epub 2006 Aug 28.

在有治疗经验的 HIV-1 感染儿童中,转换为每日一次洛匹那韦利托那韦后的药代动力学和病毒学疗效。

Pharmacokinetics and virological efficacy after switch to once-daily lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected children.

机构信息

EA 3620 Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Sep;55(9):4320-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00166-11. Epub 2011 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.00166-11
PMID:21746952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3165353/
Abstract

Lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) is a protease inhibitor that is used twice daily (BID) in the treatment of HIV infection in children. In the context of a single-center observational study, a switch to a once-a-day (QD) LPV/r regimen was proposed for considerations of convenience and to support adherence. The aims of this study were to compare the pharmacokinetics, viral loads, percentages of CD4(+) T cells, and lipid profiles after switching from a twice-daily to a once-daily regimen of LPV/r in experienced children. For this purpose, LPV concentrations, viral loads, CD4(+) T cells, and biochemistry data were measured in routine therapeutic drug monitoring procedures in 45 children and adolescents. Thirty-six children were switched to the QD regimen. Nine children on the BID or QD regimen were added for pharmacokinetic-study purposes only. The QD trough concentrations (C(trough)) of lopinavir in plasma were significantly lower than those observed with the BID regimen (P < 0.0001), but the 24-h exposure levels were not significantly lower with the QD than with the BID regimen (P = 0.09). Among 34 evaluable patients who switched from the BID to the QD regimen, the virological efficacy of LPV/r appeared to differ (P < 0.001), with 74% and 57% of viral loads, respectively, being <50 copies/ml (mean follow-up times, 33 and 20 months). Among 22 patients with stable virological control before the switch, 12 experienced either failure or blip (one observation of detectable viral load between two observations of undetectable viral load) after the switch. The change from the BID to the QD regimen did not result in significant differences in CD4(+) T cell percentages or total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride levels. The switch from the BID to the QD LPV/r regimen led to equivalent exposure and lower C(trough) values and resulted in lower levels of virological control in these antiretroviral-experienced children.

摘要

洛匹那韦利托那韦(LPV/r)是一种蛋白酶抑制剂,在儿童 HIV 感染的治疗中每天使用两次(BID)。在一项单中心观察性研究中,出于方便和支持依从性的考虑,提出将 LPV/r 的每日一次(QD)方案转换。本研究的目的是比较在有经验的儿童中从每日两次方案转换为每日一次方案后,洛匹那韦的药代动力学、病毒载量、CD4+T 细胞百分比和血脂谱。为此,在 45 名儿童和青少年的常规治疗药物监测程序中测量 LPV/r 每日两次与每日一次方案的 LPV 浓度、病毒载量、CD4+T 细胞和生物化学数据。36 名儿童转换为 QD 方案。仅出于药代动力学研究目的,9 名接受 BID 或 QD 方案的儿童被纳入研究。LPV 血浆谷浓度(C(trough)) 在 QD 方案中明显低于 BID 方案(P < 0.0001),但 24 小时暴露水平在 QD 方案中与 BID 方案相比没有明显降低(P = 0.09)。在 34 名从 BID 方案转换为 QD 方案的可评估患者中,LPV/r 的病毒学疗效似乎不同(P < 0.001),分别有 74%和 57%的病毒载量<50 拷贝/ml(平均随访时间分别为 33 个月和 20 个月)。在转换前病毒学控制稳定的 22 名患者中,12 名在转换后出现失败或短暂回升(两次不可检测的病毒载量之间观察到一次可检测的病毒载量)。从 BID 方案转换为 QD 方案不会导致 CD4+T 细胞百分比或总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇或甘油三酯水平的显著差异。从 BID 方案转换为 QD LPV/r 方案导致等效暴露和更低的 C(trough)值,并导致这些抗逆转录病毒经验丰富的儿童病毒学控制水平降低。