Department of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, Tübingen, Germany.
Circulation. 2011 Jul 26;124(4):434-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009282. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
Cerebral protection during surgery for acute aortic dissection type A relies on hypothermic circulatory arrest, either alone or in conjunction with cerebral perfusion.
The perioperative and intraoperative conditions of 1558 patients submitted from 44 cardiac surgery centers in German-speaking countries were analyzed. Among patients with acute aortic dissection type A, 355 (22.8%) underwent surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest alone. In 1115 patients (71.6%), cerebral perfusion was used: Unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) in 628 (40.3%), bilateral ACP in 453 (29.1%), and retrograde perfusion in 34 patients (2.2%). For 88 patients with acute aortic dissection type A (5.6%), no circulatory arrest and arch intervention were reported (cardiopulmonary bypass-only group). End points of the study were 30-day mortality (15.9% overall) and mortality-corrected permanent neurological dysfunction (10.5% overall). The respective values for the cardiopulmonary bypass-only group were 11.4% and 9.1%. Hypothermic circulatory arrest alone resulted in a 30-day mortality rate of 19.4% and a mortality-corrected permanent neurological dysfunction rate of 11.5%, whereas the rates were 13.9% and 10.0%, respectively, for unilateral ACP and 15.9% and 11.0%, respectively, for bilateral ACP. In contrast with the ACP groups, there was a profound increase in mortality when systemic circulatory arrest times exceeded 30 minutes in the hypothermic circulatory arrest group (P<0.001). Mortality-corrected permanent neurological dysfunction correlated significantly with perfusion pressure in the ACP groups.
This study reflects current surgical practice for acute aortic dissection type A in Central Europe. For arrest times less than 30 minutes, hypothermic circulatory arrest and ACP lead to similar results. For longer arrest periods, ACP with sufficient pressure is advisable. Outcomes with unilateral and bilateral ACP were equivalent.
在急性 A 型主动脉夹层手术中,脑保护依赖于低温停循环,单独使用或与脑灌注联合使用。
分析了来自德语国家 44 个心脏手术中心的 1558 名患者的围手术期和术中情况。在急性 A 型主动脉夹层患者中,355 名(22.8%)单独接受低温停循环手术。在 1115 名患者(71.6%)中使用了脑灌注:单侧顺行脑灌注(ACP)在 628 名患者(40.3%)中,双侧 ACP 在 453 名患者(29.1%)中,逆行灌注在 34 名患者(2.2%)中。88 名急性 A 型主动脉夹层患者(5.6%)未报告停循环和弓部干预(仅心肺转流组)。研究的终点为 30 天死亡率(总体 15.9%)和死亡率校正的永久性神经功能障碍(总体 10.5%)。仅心肺转流组的相应值分别为 11.4%和 9.1%。单独使用低温停循环的 30 天死亡率为 19.4%,死亡率校正的永久性神经功能障碍发生率为 11.5%,而单侧 ACP 组的相应值分别为 13.9%和 10.0%,双侧 ACP 组的相应值分别为 15.9%和 11.0%。与 ACP 组相比,低温停循环组当全身停循环时间超过 30 分钟时,死亡率显著增加(P<0.001)。ACP 组中,灌注压与死亡率校正的永久性神经功能障碍显著相关。
本研究反映了中欧目前急性 A 型主动脉夹层的手术实践。对于停循环时间小于 30 分钟的患者,低温停循环和 ACP 导致相似的结果。对于较长的停循环时间,建议使用具有足够压力的 ACP。单侧和双侧 ACP 的结果相当。