• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业性哮喘中气道对高分子量与低分子量化合物反应的比较

Comparison between Airway Responses to High versus Low Molecular Weight Compounds in Occupational Asthma.

作者信息

Talini D, Novelli F, Bacci E, Dente F L, De Santis M, Di Franco A, Melosini L, Vagaggini B, Paggiaro P L

机构信息

Occupational Health Unit, Prevention Department, Galleria Gerace 14, 56126 Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

J Allergy (Cairo). 2011;2011:781470. doi: 10.1155/2011/781470. Epub 2011 May 25.

DOI:10.1155/2011/781470
PMID:21747871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3124963/
Abstract

Occupational asthma (OA) is a heterogeneous disease, and the characteristics of the sensitizer responsible for OA may induce different clinical, functional, and biological manifestations. We examined the characteristics of 74 patients with OA induced by low molecular weight compounds (LMWC) or by high molecular weight compounds (HMWC) and diagnosed by specific inhalation challenge (SIC). Patients with OA induced by LMWC had a longer occupational exposure before the beginning of symptoms, a lower sputum eosinophilia, and a higher prevalence of late airway response (LAR), in comparison with patients with OA induced by HMWC. Pulmonary function tended to be poorer and atopy tended to be less frequent in LMWC-induced OA than in HMWC-induced OA. These data confirm and extend previous observations showing that the characteristics of the specific sensitizer inducing OA may determine different clinical, functional, and biological features, probably related to the difference pathogenetic mechanisms underlying these different types of OA.

摘要

职业性哮喘(OA)是一种异质性疾病,引发OA的致敏原特性可能会导致不同的临床、功能和生物学表现。我们研究了74例由低分子量化合物(LMWC)或高分子量化合物(HMWC)诱发并经特异性吸入激发试验(SIC)确诊的OA患者的特征。与HMWC诱发的OA患者相比,LMWC诱发的OA患者在症状出现前有更长的职业暴露时间、更低的痰液嗜酸性粒细胞增多以及更高的迟发性气道反应(LAR)患病率。与HMWC诱发的OA相比,LMWC诱发的OA患者肺功能往往较差,特应性往往较少见。这些数据证实并扩展了先前的观察结果,表明诱发OA的特异性致敏原特性可能决定不同的临床、功能和生物学特征,这可能与这些不同类型OA潜在的发病机制差异有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869b/3124963/0cfc8b885f0b/JA2011-781470.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869b/3124963/64083616887d/JA2011-781470.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869b/3124963/0cfc8b885f0b/JA2011-781470.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869b/3124963/64083616887d/JA2011-781470.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869b/3124963/0cfc8b885f0b/JA2011-781470.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison between Airway Responses to High versus Low Molecular Weight Compounds in Occupational Asthma.职业性哮喘中气道对高分子量与低分子量化合物反应的比较
J Allergy (Cairo). 2011;2011:781470. doi: 10.1155/2011/781470. Epub 2011 May 25.
2
Clinical and inflammatory features of occupational asthma caused by persulphate salts in comparison with asthma associated with occupational rhinitis.职业性哮喘与职业性鼻炎相关哮喘的临床和炎症特征比较:过硫酸盐盐所致哮喘。
Allergy. 2010 Jun 1;65(6):784-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02288.x. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
3
Sputum inflammatory profile before and after specific inhalation challenge in individuals with suspected occupational asthma.疑似职业性哮喘患者特异性吸入挑战前后的痰液炎症特征。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e78304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078304. eCollection 2013.
4
Are high- and low-molecular-weight sensitizing agents associated with different clinical phenotypes of occupational asthma?高分子和低分子致敏剂与职业性哮喘的不同临床表型有关吗?
Allergy. 2019 Feb;74(2):261-272. doi: 10.1111/all.13542. Epub 2018 Nov 25.
5
Leukocyte counts in hypertonic saline-induced sputum in subjects with occupational asthma.职业性哮喘患者高渗盐水诱导痰液中的白细胞计数
Respir Med. 1998 Mar;92(3):550-7. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(98)90307-9.
6
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
7
An official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report: presentations and discussion of the fifth Jack Pepys Workshop on Asthma in the Workplace. Comparisons between asthma in the workplace and non-work-related asthma.一份美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告:第五届杰克·佩皮斯职业性哮喘研讨会的报告及讨论。职业性哮喘与非职业性哮喘的比较。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Jul;12(7):S99-S110. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201505-281ST.
8
Sputum Inflammatory Patterns Are Associated With Distinct Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Occupational Asthma Independently of the Causal Agent.痰炎症模式与职业性哮喘患者的临床特征有关,与致病因子无关。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2024 Apr 12;34(2):85-96. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0868. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
9
Do Low Molecular Weight Agents Cause More Severe Asthma than High Molecular Weight Agents?低分子量制剂引发的哮喘比高分子量制剂更严重吗?
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 9;11(6):e0156141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156141. eCollection 2016.
10
Changes in sputum cell counts after exposure to occupational agents: what do they mean?接触职业性因素后痰液细胞计数的变化:这些变化意味着什么?
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Jun;107(6):1063-8. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.115486.

引用本文的文献

1
Causes and Phenotypes of Work-Related Asthma.工作相关哮喘的病因和表型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 30;17(13):4713. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134713.
2
Bronchial Response to High and Low Molecular Weight Occupational Inhalant Allergens.支气管对高分子量和低分子量职业性吸入变应原的反应
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2020 Jan;12(1):164-170. doi: 10.4168/aair.2020.12.1.164.
3
Do airway inflammation and airway responsiveness markers at the start of apprenticeship predict their evolution during initial training? A longitudinal study among apprentice bakers, pastry makers and hairdressers.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome of occupational asthma after removal from exposure: A follow-up study.职业性哮喘暴露后结局:随访研究。
Can Respir J. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):61-6. doi: 10.1155/2010/509807.
2
Mechanisms of occupational asthma.职业性哮喘的发病机制。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Mar;123(3):531-42; quiz 543-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.01.057.
3
Comparative airway response to high- versus low-molecular weight agents in occupational asthma.职业性哮喘中高分子量与低分子量物质的气道反应比较
在学徒生涯开始时的气道炎症和气道反应性标志物是否能预测他们在初始培训期间的发展?一项针对面包师、糕点师和理发师学徒的纵向研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0674-9.
4
Review of Diagnostic Challenges in Occupational Asthma.职业性哮喘诊断挑战述评。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017 Jan;17(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11882-017-0676-3.
5
Management of work-related asthma: guidelines and challenges.职业性哮喘的管理:指南与挑战
Eur Respir Rev. 2012 Jun 1;21(124):79-81. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00002912.
6
Diagnosis of occupational asthma: an update.职业性哮喘的诊断:最新进展。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2012 Jun;12(3):221-31. doi: 10.1007/s11882-012-0259-2.
Eur Respir J. 2009 Apr;33(4):734-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00120407. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
4
Agents causing occupational asthma.导致职业性哮喘的因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Mar;123(3):545-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.09.010. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
5
Diagnosis and management of work-related asthma: American College Of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement.职业性哮喘的诊断与管理:美国胸科医师学会共识声明
Chest. 2008 Sep;134(3 Suppl):1S-41S. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0201.
6
Factors associated with severity of occupational asthma with a latency period at diagnosis.与诊断时具有潜伏期的职业性哮喘严重程度相关的因素。
Allergy. 2007 Jul;62(7):795-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01424.x.
7
FEV1 decline in occupational asthma.职业性哮喘患者的第1秒用力呼气容积下降
Thorax. 2006 Sep;61(9):751-5. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.054080. Epub 2006 May 2.
8
Distinguishing severe asthma phenotypes: role of age at onset and eosinophilic inflammation.区分重度哮喘表型:发病年龄和嗜酸性粒细胞炎症的作用。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Jan;113(1):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.10.041.
9
Diagnosing occupational asthma: how, how much, how far?职业性哮喘的诊断:如何诊断、诊断程度如何、进展到何种程度?
Eur Respir J. 2003 May;21(5):879-85. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00000403.
10
Diagnosis of flour-induced occupational asthma in a cross-sectional study.横断面研究中面粉诱发职业性哮喘的诊断
Respir Med. 2002 Apr;96(4):236-43. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1259.