Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011 Dec;49(12):1405-12. doi: 10.1007/s11517-011-0804-5. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
There is growing evidence that femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a probable risk factor for the development of early osteoarthritis in the nondysplastic hip. As FAI arises with end range of motion activities, measurement errors related to skin movement might be higher than anticipated when using previously reported methods for kinematic evaluation of the hip. We performed an in vitro validation and reliability study of a noninvasive method to define pelvic and femur positions in end range of motion activities of the hip using an electromagnetic tracking device. Motion data, collected from sensors attached to the bone and skin of 11 cadaver hips, were simultaneously obtained and compared in a global reference frame. Motion data were then transposed in the hip joint local coordinate systems. Observer-related variability in locating the anatomical landmarks required to define the local coordinate system and variability of determining the hip joint center was evaluated. Angular root mean square (RMS) differences between the bony and skin sensors averaged 3.2° (SD 3.5°) and 1.8° (SD 2.3°) in the global reference frame for the femur and pelvic sensors, respectively. Angular RMS differences between the bony and skin sensors in the hip joint local coordinate systems ranged at end range of motion and dependent on the motion under investigation from 1.91 to 5.81°. The presented protocol for evaluation of hip motion seems to be suited for the 3-D description of motion relevant to the experimental and clinical evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement.
越来越多的证据表明,股骨髋臼撞击(FAI)是髋关节非发育性髋臼病变患者早期骨关节炎发展的一个可能的危险因素。由于 FAI 是在髋关节活动的末端范围出现的,因此在使用先前报道的髋关节运动学评估方法时,与皮肤运动相关的测量误差可能比预期的要高。我们使用电磁跟踪装置对一种非侵入性方法进行了体外验证和可靠性研究,该方法用于定义髋关节末端活动中的骨盆和股骨位置。从附着在骨骼和皮肤上的传感器收集到的运动数据在全局参考框架中同时获得并进行比较。然后,运动数据被转换到髋关节局部坐标系中。评估了定位定义局部坐标系所需的解剖学标志点和确定髋关节中心的观察者相关可变性。在全局参考框架中,骨传感器和皮肤传感器的角度均方根(RMS)差异分别为 3.2°(SD 3.5°)和 1.8°(SD 2.3°),用于股骨和骨盆传感器。在髋关节局部坐标系中,骨传感器和皮肤传感器之间的角度 RMS 差异在末端范围的运动和所研究的运动中变化,范围从 1.91°到 5.81°。所提出的髋关节运动评估方案似乎适合于与股骨髋臼撞击的实验和临床评估相关的运动的 3-D 描述。