Suppr超能文献

药物相互作用管理指南的清晰度和适用性:荷兰全科医生和社区药剂师的系统评价。

Clarity and applicability of drug-drug interaction management guidelines: a systematic appraisal by general practitioners and community pharmacists in the Netherlands.

机构信息

SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2011 Aug 1;34(8):683-90. doi: 10.2165/11587270-000000000-00000.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability and daily use of computerized drug-drug interaction surveillance systems, exposure to potentially relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) continues. DDI management guidelines are often inadequate and clear management options are lacking, which attributes to overriding of DDI signals. Although general criteria for the development and reporting of high-quality clinical practice guidelines have been identified, it appears these have not yet been applied to DDI management guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess the clarity and applicability of guidelines for the management of potentially harmful DDIs.

METHODS

We selected 13 DDIs that are potentially harmful for patients and frequently occur in community pharmacy practice in the Netherlands. The clarity and applicability of the management guidelines of these DDIs were appraised using the appropriate two domains - 'Clarity and presentation' and 'Applicability', of the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument. The appraisal was performed by 12 community pharmacists and 12 general practitioners. The standardized domain scores and mean item scores for 'Clarity and presentation' and 'Applicability' were compared.

RESULTS

All DDI management guidelines were generally found to score well on 'Clarity and presentation', but poorly with respect to 'Applicability' (standardized domain scores 68.0 vs 26.1%). Within the domain 'Clarity and presentation', the item 'tools for application' received the lowest scores. Within the domain 'Applicability', cost implications, organizational barriers and key review criteria were all poorly documented. All guidelines presented non-directive advice using words such as 'consider' and 'regularly'.

CONCLUSIONS

Developers of DDI management guidelines should take the appropriate domains of the AGREE Instrument into consideration in their development processes. The applicability of DDI management guidelines should be pretested before publishing. To improve guideline quality, more attention should particularly be paid to the available tools for applications and cost implications.

摘要

背景

尽管有计算机化药物相互作用监测系统可供使用且每天都在使用,但仍会发生潜在相关的药物相互作用(DDI)。DDI 管理指南通常不够充分,缺乏明确的管理选择,这导致 DDI 信号被忽略。尽管已经确定了开发和报告高质量临床实践指南的一般标准,但似乎尚未将这些标准应用于 DDI 管理指南。

目的

本研究旨在评估潜在有害 DDI 管理指南的清晰度和适用性。

方法

我们选择了 13 种在荷兰社区药房实践中对患者有潜在危害且经常发生的潜在有害 DDI。使用经过验证的评估研究和评估指南(AGREE)工具的两个适当领域——“清晰度和演示”和“适用性”,评估这些 DDI 管理指南的清晰度和适用性。由 12 名社区药剂师和 12 名全科医生进行评估。比较了“清晰度和演示”和“适用性”的标准化领域得分和平均项目得分。

结果

所有 DDI 管理指南在“清晰度和演示”方面总体得分较好,但在“适用性”方面得分较差(标准化领域得分 68.0 与 26.1%)。在“清晰度和演示”领域,“应用工具”项得分最低。在“适用性”领域,成本影响、组织障碍和关键审查标准记录都很差。所有指南都使用了诸如“考虑”和“定期”等词来提供非指令性建议。

结论

DDI 管理指南的开发者在其开发过程中应考虑 AGREE 工具的适当领域。在发布之前,应预先测试 DDI 管理指南的适用性。为了提高指南质量,应特别注意可用的应用工具和成本影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验