Middlesex University, London, UK.
Br J Psychol. 2011 Aug;102(3):328-39. doi: 10.1348/000712610X522572. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
To date, there has been numerous reports that early acquired pictures and words are named faster than late acquired pictures and words in normal reading but it is not established whether age of acquisition (AoA) has the same impact on adult dyslexic naming, especially in a transparent orthography such as Turkish. Independent ratings were obtained for AoA, frequency, name agreement, and object familiarity in Turkish for all items in the Snodgrass and Vanderwart line drawing set. Dyslexic (N= 15) and non-dyslexic (N= 15) university undergraduates were asked to name 30 early acquired and 30 late acquired pictures and picture names standardized and selected from these norms. As predicted, there were main effects for (a) AoA with reaction times (RTs) for Early items named faster than Late items, (b) reader status with non-dyslexic students faster than dyslexic students, and (c) stimuli types with pictures named slower than words. A two-way interaction between reader status and stimuli type was also significant. Implications of the results for theoretical frameworks of AoA within the cognitive architecture and normal and impaired models of reading are discussed.
迄今为止,有大量报告表明,在正常阅读中,早期习得的图片和单词比晚期习得的图片和单词命名更快,但尚不确定获得年龄 (AoA) 是否对成年阅读障碍者的命名有相同的影响,尤其是在像土耳其语这样的透明正字法中。在土耳其语中,对所有 Snodgrass 和 Vanderwart 线图集中的项目进行了 AoA、频率、名称一致性和物体熟悉度的独立评估。要求 15 名阅读障碍者和 15 名非阅读障碍者大学生命名 30 个早期习得的和 30 个晚期习得的图片和图片名称,这些名称是从这些规范中标准化和选择的。正如预测的那样,出现了以下主要影响:(a) AoA,早期项目的反应时间 (RT) 比晚期项目快,(b) 非阅读障碍者比阅读障碍者学生快,(c) 图片命名比单词慢。读者状态和刺激类型之间的双向相互作用也很显著。讨论了这些结果对认知架构内 AoA 的理论框架以及正常和受损阅读模型的影响。