• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大五人格和基本价值观的高阶因素:实证与理论关系。

Higher-order factors of the big five and basic values: empirical and theoretical relations.

机构信息

Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Psychol. 2011 Aug;102(3):478-98. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02006.x. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02006.x
PMID:21752001
Abstract

The Big Five Model of personality and Schwartz's theory of basic values are two prominent taxonomies that offer a convenient way to organize the major individual differences in, respectively, personality traits and personal values. Both taxonomies provide a hierarchical framework, whose components can be traced back to a smaller number of broader dimensions. The current study investigated the relationship between the two superordinate factors of personality encompassing the Big Five dimensions (alpha and beta) and the four higher-level value types from Schwartz's theory (Self-transcendence, Self-enhancement, Conservation, and Openness to change). To examine the relations between higher-order traits and values, we relied on factor analysis and multidimensional scaling. Results indicated that alpha and beta were differently related to the Conservation versus Openness to change dimension. Alpha was positively related to values that emphasize protecting stability and respecting norms and traditions, and negatively related to values emphasizing receptiveness to change and independence of thought, feeling, and action. The opposite pattern of relations was found for beta.

摘要

大五人格模型和施瓦茨的基本价值观理论是两种突出的分类法,分别为人格特质和个人价值观的主要个体差异提供了一种方便的组织方式。这两种分类法都提供了一个层次结构框架,其组成部分可以追溯到少数更广泛的维度。本研究调查了大五人格维度(alpha 和 beta)涵盖的两个超人格因素与施瓦茨理论中的四个更高层次的价值类型(自我超越、自我增强、保守和对变化的开放)之间的关系。为了检验高阶特质和价值观之间的关系,我们依赖于因素分析和多维尺度分析。结果表明,alpha 和 beta 与保守与对变化的开放性维度的关系不同。alpha 与强调保护稳定性和尊重规范和传统的价值观呈正相关,与强调对变化的接受和思想、情感和行动的独立性的价值观呈负相关。beta 则出现了相反的关系模式。

相似文献

1
Higher-order factors of the big five and basic values: empirical and theoretical relations.大五人格和基本价值观的高阶因素:实证与理论关系。
Br J Psychol. 2011 Aug;102(3):478-98. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02006.x. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
2
Motivational Basis of Personality Traits: A Meta-Analysis of Value-Personality Correlations.人格特质的动机基础:价值观-人格相关性的元分析。
J Pers. 2015 Oct;83(5):491-510. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12125. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
3
Measuring values with the Short Schwartz's Value Survey.使用简短施瓦茨价值观调查问卷测量价值观。
J Pers Assess. 2005 Oct;85(2):170-8. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8502_09.
4
Personality and prejudice: from Big Five personality factors to facets.人格与偏见:从大五人格因素到人格特质
J Pers. 2007 Oct;75(5):899-925. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00460.x.
5
The structure of intraindividual value change.个体内价值观变化的结构。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Nov;97(5):913-29. doi: 10.1037/a0016617.
6
Alpha and Beta traits and egoistic and moralistic self-enhancement: a point of convergence between two research traditions.阿尔法和贝塔特质与自我中心和道德主义的自我提升:两个研究传统的交汇点。
J Pers. 2013 Feb;81(1):39-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00786.x. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
7
Effects of basic human values on host community acculturation orientations.基本人类价值观对宿主社区文化适应取向的影响。
Int J Psychol. 2010 Aug 1;45(4):311-9. doi: 10.1080/00207591003587978.
8
Metatraits of the Big Five differentially predict engagement and restraint of behavior.大五人格的元特质对行为的参与和抑制有不同的预测作用。
J Pers. 2009 Aug;77(4):1085-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00575.x. Epub 2009 May 19.
9
The nature and structure of correlations among Big Five ratings: the halo-alpha-beta model.大五人格评定之间的关联的本质和结构:晕轮-α-β模型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Dec;97(6):1142-56. doi: 10.1037/a0017159.
10
Measuring the Four Higher-Order Values in Schwartz's Theory: Validation of a 17-Item Inventory.测量施瓦茨理论中的四种高阶价值观:一份17项量表的验证
J Pers Assess. 2024 Sep-Oct;106(5):651-664. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2024.2311193. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Who is open to change after the COVID-19 pandemic? Some insights from Germany.新冠疫情之后,谁愿意做出改变?来自德国的一些见解。
J Clean Prod. 2023 Jun 16:137754. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137754.
2
Research on the Influence of Non-Cognitive Ability and Social Support Perception on College Students' Entrepreneurial Intention.非认知能力与社会支持感知对大学生创业意向的影响研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 22;19(19):11981. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911981.
3
Associations of Agency and Communion With Domain-Specific Self-Perceptions of Aging: A Cross-Sectional Study In Old-Old Adults in Poor Health.
能动性和共融与特定领域衰老自我认知的关联:健康状况不佳的高龄老人的横断面研究。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2022 Sep;95(2):245-262. doi: 10.1177/00914150211050874. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
4
Scientists' personality, values, and well-being.科学家的个性、价值观与幸福安康。
Springerplus. 2016 May 12;5:613. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2225-2. eCollection 2016.
5
Broad bandwidth or high fidelity? Evidence from the structure of genetic and environmental effects on the facets of the five factor model.广泛的带宽还是高保真度?遗传和环境对五因素模型各个方面的影响结构的证据。
Behav Genet. 2012 Sep;42(5):743-63. doi: 10.1007/s10519-012-9548-8. Epub 2012 Jun 14.