Suppr超能文献

萘普生+埃索美拉唑联合用药治疗类风湿性疾病的安全性及合理应用

Safety aspects and rational use of a naproxen + esomeprazole combination in the treatment of rheumatoid disease.

作者信息

Roberts David N, Miner Philip B

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Digestive Diseases Section, University of Oklahoma.

出版信息

Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2011;3:1-8. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S7329. Epub 2011 Mar 3.

Abstract

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely prescribed for reduction of pain and inflammation, particularly in the setting of rheumatologic disorders. While effective, they are associated with risks, including nephrotoxicity, gastrointestinal inflammation, peptic ulcer disease, and worsened cardiovascular outcomes. After development of cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors to minimize gastrointestinal complications, early use revealed increased cardiovascular event rate risk, and retrospective analysis of traditional NSAIDs revealed similar concerns, with the exception of naproxen. PN400 is a fixed-dose combination formulation designed to provide sequential delivery of a nonenteric-coated, immediate-release esomeprazole 20 mg mantle followed by an enteric-coated naproxen 500 mg core. This review summarizes the pharmacokinetics, benefits, safety, and tolerability of PN400. Phase I trials demonstrated pharmacokinetics consistent with its formulation, and at different esomeprazole combination doses, PN400 containing esomeprazole 20 mg was the lowest dose that still resulted in substantial sustained increases of gastric pH > 4. In two Phase III trials (Study 301 and Study 302), PN400 resulted in a significant reduction in gastric ulcers relative to enteric-coated naproxen (4.1% to 23.1% in Study 301, 7.1% to 24.3% in Study 302). Discontinuation due to NSAID-associated upper gastrointestinal adverse events or duodenal ulcers was significantly less in PN400 patients (3.2% to 12%, P < 0.001, in Study 301; 4.8% to 11.9%, P = 0.009, in Study 302). Two subjective patient indices were utilized to assess tolerability, ie, the Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment (SODA) and Overall Treatment Evaluation of Dyspepsia (OTE-DP). Patients with PN400 had significantly better upper gastrointestinal tolerability compared with those treated with enteric-coated naproxen in terms of SODA scores, proportion of heartburn-free patients, and OTE-DP response. While no formal recommendations are available at this time for use of this new combination medication, it will likely become an important treatment option with application for many patients.

摘要

非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)被广泛用于减轻疼痛和炎症,尤其是在风湿性疾病的治疗中。虽然它们有效,但也存在风险,包括肾毒性、胃肠道炎症、消化性溃疡疾病以及心血管疾病恶化。在研发出环氧化酶2抑制剂以尽量减少胃肠道并发症后,早期使用发现心血管事件发生率风险增加,对传统NSAIDs的回顾性分析也显示了类似的担忧,但萘普生除外。PN400是一种固定剂量组合制剂,旨在依次释放20毫克非肠溶包衣的即释埃索美拉唑衣层,随后是500毫克肠溶包衣的萘普生核心。本综述总结了PN400的药代动力学、益处、安全性和耐受性。I期试验证明其药代动力学与其制剂相符,在不同的埃索美拉唑组合剂量下,含20毫克埃索美拉唑的PN400是仍能使胃pH值持续大幅升高至>4的最低剂量。在两项III期试验(研究301和研究302)中,与肠溶包衣萘普生相比,PN400导致胃溃疡显著减少(研究301中从4.1%降至23.1%,研究302中从7.1%降至24.3%)。因NSAID相关的上消化道不良事件或十二指肠溃疡而停药的PN400患者明显更少(研究301中为3.2%至12%,P<0.001;研究302中为4.8%至11.9%,P = 0.009)。使用两个主观患者指标来评估耐受性,即消化不良严重程度评估(SODA)和消化不良总体治疗评估(OTE-DP)。就SODA评分、无烧心患者比例和OTE-DP反应而言,PN400患者的上消化道耐受性明显优于接受肠溶包衣萘普生治疗的患者。虽然目前尚无关于使用这种新组合药物的正式建议,但它可能会成为许多患者的重要治疗选择。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Review article: cellular and molecular mechanisms of NSAID-induced peptic ulcers.综述:非甾体抗炎药致消化性溃疡的细胞及分子机制
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Sep 15;30(6):517-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04086.x. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
8
Gastrointestinal safety of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors: a Cochrane Collaboration systematic review.环氧化酶-2抑制剂的胃肠道安全性:Cochrane协作网系统评价
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jul;5(7):818-28, 828.e1-5; quiz 768. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.03.011. Epub 2007 Jun 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验