• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉注射铁剂自发报告的超敏反应和严重不良事件的差异:欧洲与北美的比较。

Differences in spontaneously reported hypersensitivity and serious adverse events for intravenous iron preparations: comparison of Europe and North America.

作者信息

Bailie George R, Hörl Walter H, Verhoef Jan-Jaap

机构信息

Albany Nephrology Pharmacy Group, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, NY 12208, USA.

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 2011;61(5):267-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296198.

DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1296198
PMID:21755809
Abstract

Spontaneously-reported rates of adverse events (AEs) of intravenous (i.v.) iron products have not been compared since 2007. AEs in Europe (Eur) and North America (NA) have never been compared. New products have been marketed and many changes in prescribing habits have occurred since then, and the effect on AEs reporting is unclear. It was hypothesized that changing practices for i.v. iron products has caused changes in the rates of serious AEs and large differences exist between Eur and NA. Rates of AEs for three i.v. iron preparations (iron sucrose [IS], ferric gluconate [FG] and high and low MW iron dextran [HMWID, LMWID]) were compared by product and continent from January 1, 2003 to June 30, 2009 for selected countries in Eur and NA, using the Uppsala Monitoring Center's database. Rates of total, anaphylaxis and other serious allergic AEs were calculated as number of AEs divided by i.v. iron sales standardized to 100 mg dose equivalents (DEq) of iron. Quarterly sales (millions of 100 mg DEq of iron) increased from the first quarter 2003 to the end of the second quarter of 2009 by 1% for FG, 16% for IS and 2% for ID. Total AEs for NA plus Eur were similar for FG and IS, but total AEs were 6- to 7-fold higher for ID. Rates of anaphylaxis were 6- to 11-fold higher in Eur plus NA combined for ID than for IS or FG. In NA, there were substantially higher reports for total, anaphylaxis and other serious allergic AEs with FG compared to IS, whereas the reverse was the case in Eur. Odds ratios (OR) showed higher risks of anaphylaxis with FG in NA vs. Eur (OR = 4.40, P < 0.0001) and lower risks with IS (OR = 0.24, P < 0.0001). Odds of anaphylaxis with LMWID in Eur vs. FG and IS were 42.08 and 16.92 (both P < 0.0001), respectively. In NA, odds of anaphylaxis with ID vs. FG and IS were 2.36 and 17.73 (both P < 0.0001), respectively. Differences between NA and Eur may be related to varied treatment practices. ID had the highest rates of all types of AEs, and IS and FG had a continued trend for lowest rates of AEs.

摘要

自2007年以来,尚未对静脉注射铁剂产品的不良事件(AE)自发报告率进行比较。欧洲(Eur)和北美(NA)的不良事件从未进行过比较。从那时起,新产品已上市,处方习惯也发生了许多变化,而这些变化对不良事件报告的影响尚不清楚。据推测,静脉注射铁剂产品使用方式的改变已导致严重不良事件发生率发生变化,且欧洲和北美之间存在很大差异。利用乌普萨拉监测中心的数据库,对2003年1月1日至2009年6月30日期间欧洲和北美部分国家三种静脉注射铁剂制剂(蔗糖铁[IS]、葡萄糖酸铁[FG]以及高、低分子量右旋糖酐铁[HMWID、LMWID])的不良事件发生率按产品和地区进行了比较。将总不良事件、过敏反应及其他严重过敏不良事件的发生率计算为不良事件数量除以经标准化至100mg铁剂量当量(DEq)的静脉注射铁剂销售量。从2003年第一季度到2009年第二季度末,葡萄糖酸铁的季度销售量(以100mg铁DEq计,单位:百万)增长了1%,蔗糖铁增长了16%,右旋糖酐铁增长了2%。北美和欧洲葡萄糖酸铁与蔗糖铁的总不良事件发生率相似,但右旋糖酐铁的总不良事件发生率高出6至7倍。欧洲和北美合计,右旋糖酐铁的过敏反应发生率比蔗糖铁或葡萄糖酸铁高出6至11倍。在北美,葡萄糖酸铁的总不良事件、过敏反应及其他严重过敏不良事件报告显著多于蔗糖铁,而在欧洲情况则相反。比值比(OR)显示,北美葡萄糖酸铁发生过敏反应的风险高于欧洲(OR = 4.40,P < 0.0001),而蔗糖铁的风险较低(OR = 0.24,P < 0.0001)。欧洲低分子量右旋糖酐铁与葡萄糖酸铁和蔗糖铁相比,发生过敏反应的比值分别为42.08和16.92(P均< 0.0001)。在北美,右旋糖酐铁与葡萄糖酸铁和蔗糖铁相比,发生过敏反应的比值分别为2.36和17.73(P均< 0.0001)。北美和欧洲之间的差异可能与不同的治疗方式有关。右旋糖酐铁各类不良事件的发生率最高,而蔗糖铁和葡萄糖酸铁的不良事件发生率持续呈最低趋势。

相似文献

1
Differences in spontaneously reported hypersensitivity and serious adverse events for intravenous iron preparations: comparison of Europe and North America.静脉注射铁剂自发报告的超敏反应和严重不良事件的差异:欧洲与北美的比较。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2011;61(5):267-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296198.
2
Differences in the reporting rates of serious allergic adverse events from intravenous iron by country and population.不同国家和人群静脉注射铁剂导致严重过敏不良事件报告率的差异。
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2012 Feb;10(2):101-8.
3
Hypersensitivity reactions and deaths associated with intravenous iron preparations.与静脉注射铁剂相关的超敏反应和死亡
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Jul;20(7):1443-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh820. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
4
Comparison of rates of reported adverse events associated with i.v. iron products in the United States.比较美国静脉铁产品相关不良事件报告率。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012 Feb 15;69(4):310-20. doi: 10.2146/ajhp110262.
5
Comparative Risk of Anaphylactic Reactions Associated With Intravenous Iron Products.静脉铁剂相关过敏反应的比较风险。
JAMA. 2015 Nov 17;314(19):2062-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15572.
6
Sodium ferric gluconate complex in sucrose: safer intravenous iron therapy than iron dextrans.蔗糖铁:比右旋糖酐铁更安全的静脉铁剂治疗药物。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1999 Mar;33(3):464-70. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(99)70183-6.
7
The comparative safety of various intravenous iron preparations in chronic kidney disease patients.各种静脉铁剂制剂在慢性肾脏病患者中的比较安全性。
Ren Fail. 2008;30(6):629-38. doi: 10.1080/08860220802134631.
8
Reported Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions after Intravenous Iron Administration in the European Economic Area (EEA) Before and After Implementation of Risk Minimization Measures.在欧洲经济区(EEA)实施风险最小化措施前后,报告了静脉铁剂给药后的严重过敏反应。
Drug Saf. 2020 Jan;43(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00868-5.
9
Use of parenteral iron products and serious anaphylactic-type reactions.静脉用铁剂产品的使用与严重过敏样反应。
Am J Hematol. 2010 Sep;85(9):650-4. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21794.
10
Frequency and Associated Costs of Anaphylaxis- and Hypersensitivity-Related Adverse Events for Intravenous Iron Products in the USA: An Analysis Using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.美国静脉用铁剂产品过敏和过敏反应相关不良事件的发生频率和相关费用:利用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统进行的分析。
Drug Saf. 2021 Jan;44(1):107-119. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-01022-2. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
IV iron formulations and use in adults.静脉铁剂制剂及在成人中的应用。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2023 Dec 8;2023(1):622-629. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2023000495.
2
Reported Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions after Intravenous Iron Administration in the European Economic Area (EEA) Before and After Implementation of Risk Minimization Measures.在欧洲经济区(EEA)实施风险最小化措施前后,报告了静脉铁剂给药后的严重过敏反应。
Drug Saf. 2020 Jan;43(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00868-5.
3
Authors' reply to Schaffalitzky de Muckadell and colleague's Comment on "Evaluation of the Reported Rates of Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions Associated with Ferric Carboxymaltose and Iron (III) Isomaltoside 1000 in Europe Based on Data from EudraVigilance and VigiBase™ between 2014 and 2017".
作者对沙法利茨基·德·穆卡德尔及其同事对“基于2014年至2017年欧洲药品不良反应数据库(EudraVigilance)和VigiBase™数据评估与羧基麦芽糖铁和异麦芽糖酐铁1000相关的严重过敏反应报告率”的评论的回复
Drug Saf. 2019 May;42(5):693-696. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00815-4.
4
Evaluation of the Reported Rates of Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions Associated with Ferric Carboxymaltose and Iron (III) Isomaltoside 1000 in Europe Based on Data from EudraVigilance and VigiBase™ between 2014 and 2017.基于 2014 年至 2017 年 EudraVigilance 和 VigiBaseTM 数据库中的数据评估在欧洲铁羧麦芽糖和三价异麦芽糖 1000 相关严重超敏反应报告率。
Drug Saf. 2019 Mar;42(3):463-471. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0769-5.
5
Comparative Evaluation of U.S. Brand and Generic Intravenous Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Sucrose Injection: In Vitro Cellular Uptake.美国品牌与蔗糖注射用葡萄糖酸铁钠复合物仿制药的体外细胞摄取比较评估
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2017 Dec 15;7(12):451. doi: 10.3390/nano7120451.
6
Outcomes Associated with Conventional Accelerated Versus Once-Weekly IV Iron Therapy in Outpatients Undergoing Hemodialysis.接受血液透析的门诊患者中,常规加速静脉铁剂治疗与每周一次静脉铁剂治疗的疗效比较。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015 Jul-Aug;68(4):304-10.
7
Hypersensitivity to intravenous iron: classification, terminology, mechanisms and management.静脉铁剂超敏反应:分类、术语、机制与管理
Br J Pharmacol. 2015 Nov;172(21):5025-36. doi: 10.1111/bph.13268. Epub 2015 Oct 25.
8
A European patient record study on diagnosis and treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia.一项关于化疗引起的贫血的诊断和治疗的欧洲患者记录研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Aug;22(8):2197-206. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2189-0.
9
Double bull's eye for post-operative intravenous iron in patient blood management: better outcome and cost-effective.术后静脉注射铁剂用于患者血液管理的双重优势:更好的疗效和成本效益。
Blood Transfus. 2014 Jan;12(1):7-9. doi: 10.2450/2013.0227-13. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
10
Comparison of oxidative stress and inflammation induced by different intravenous iron sucrose similar preparations in a rat model.不同蔗糖铁类似静脉制剂在大鼠模型中诱导的氧化应激和炎症比较
Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2012 Feb;11(1):66-78. doi: 10.2174/187152812798889358.