• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生技术评估中的性别问题:代理机构方法的初步研究。

Gender in health technology assessment: pilot study on agency approaches.

机构信息

Technische Universität Berlin.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Jul;27(3):224-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000237.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462311000237
PMID:21756411
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Gender as a social construct is a recognized health determinant. Because best practice in reporting health technology assessment (HTA) clearly specifies the need to appraise a technology's social impact within the target population, the extent to which gender issues are taken into account in HTA production is of interest, not only in light of equitable practices but also for reasons of effectiveness. The aim of this study is to provide a first assessment of the degree of gender sensitivity shown by HTA agencies around the world today.

METHODS

The Web sites of sixty HTA agencies were analyzed. The consideration of gender aspects was specifically looked for in each agency's general mission statement, its priority setting process, and its methodological approach. Additionally, specific gender-oriented initiatives not belonging to any of the aforementioned categories were identified.

RESULTS

Of the sixty agencies, less than half mention a commitment to addressing the social implication of health technologies. Only fifteen institutions make information on their priority setting principles available on their Web sites and gender was an issue in two of those cases. Data on methodology were obtainable online from 18 agencies, two of which mentioned gender issues explicitly. Finally, gender-oriented initiatives were identified by thirteen agencies.

CONCLUSIONS

A gender-sensitive approach is apparently rarely adopted in current HTA production. Exceptional practices and relevant tools do exist and could serve as examples to be promoted by international collaborative networks.

摘要

目的

性别是一种社会建构,是一个公认的健康决定因素。由于报告卫生技术评估(HTA)的最佳实践明确规定需要评估技术在目标人群中的社会影响,因此,在 HTA 制作中考虑性别问题的程度不仅与公平实践有关,而且与有效性有关。本研究旨在首次评估全球 HTA 机构在多大程度上具有性别敏感性。

方法

分析了 60 个 HTA 机构的网站。在每个机构的总体使命陈述、其优先级设置过程及其方法学方法中,特别寻找性别方面的考虑。此外,还确定了不属于上述任何类别的特定面向性别的举措。

结果

在 60 家机构中,不到一半的机构提到承诺解决卫生技术的社会影响问题。只有 15 家机构在其网站上提供有关其优先级设置原则的信息,其中只有两家机构在这两种情况下将性别问题作为一个问题。有 18 家机构可以在线获得有关方法的数据,其中两家明确提到了性别问题。最后,13 家机构确定了面向性别的举措。

结论

显然,在当前的 HTA 制作中,很少采用对性别敏感的方法。存在例外做法和相关工具,可以作为国际合作网络推广的范例。

相似文献

1
Gender in health technology assessment: pilot study on agency approaches.卫生技术评估中的性别问题:代理机构方法的初步研究。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Jul;27(3):224-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000237.
2
Practical tools and methods for health technology assessment in Europe: structures, methodologies, and tools developed by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA.在欧洲进行卫生技术评估的实用工具和方法:欧洲卫生技术评估网络(EUnetHTA)制定的结构、方法和工具。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Dec;25 Suppl 2:1-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990626.
3
[Quality of health care, accreditation, and health technology assessment in Croatia: role of agency for quality and accreditation in health].克罗地亚的医疗保健质量、认证与卫生技术评估:卫生质量与认证机构的作用
Acta Med Croatica. 2010 Dec;64(5):425-34.
4
Health technology assessment agencies: an international overview of organizational aspects.卫生技术评估机构:组织层面的国际概述
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Fall;23(4):414-24. doi: 10.1017/S026646230707064X.
5
Surrogate outcomes in health technology assessment: an international comparison.卫生技术评估中的替代结局:一项国际比较。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25(3):315-22. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990213.
6
Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment.绘制健康技术评估中社会与伦理问题的整合情况。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Winter;23(1):9-16. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307051513.
7
Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe.卫生技术评估:欧洲的研究趋势和未来重点。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Jul;16 Suppl 2:6-15. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011050.
8
Use of the Internet in scanning the horizon for new and emerging health technologies: a survey of agencies involved in horizon scanning.利用互联网扫描新出现的卫生技术领域:对参与领域扫描的机构的一项调查
J Med Internet Res. 2003 Jan-Mar;5(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.1.e6.
9
Economic evaluations conducted by Canadian health technology assessment agencies: where do we stand?加拿大卫生技术评估机构进行的经济评估:我们目前的状况如何?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Fall;24(4):437-44. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080574.
10
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF MEDICAL DEVICES IN EUROPE: PROCESSES, PRACTICES, AND METHODS.欧洲医疗器械的卫生技术评估:流程、实践与方法
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(4):246-255. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000349. Epub 2016 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The challenges of including sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews: a qualitative survey.在系统评价中纳入性别分析的挑战:一项定性调查。
Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 10;3:33. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-33.