Obholzer R J, Gibson W P R
Sydney Cochlear Implant Centre, Gladesville Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2011 Feb;12(1):44-7. doi: 10.1179/146701010X486525.
Clinicians traditionally advise patients that implantation with a conventional full cochlear implant array will lead to loss of any remaining hearing in the implanted ear. We sought to assess the extent to which 'standard' insertion of a full electrode array affects cochlear function.
Air conduction pure tone audiometry was performed as part of the routine 6-month postimplantation audiological assessment for 81 adult patients who preoperatively had identifiable pure tone thresholds. All patients were implanted with the nucleus CI24 device, with complete insertion of a straight array in 68 and a contour array in 13 patients. A separate cochleostomy was fashioned anterior to the round window using a 1 mm diamond burr, and the array inserted without lubrication. The operating surgeon was blinded to the inclusion of patients in this study at the time of surgery.
Of 81 patients, 58 preserved some residual hearing at 6 months. The rate of preservation of hearing was higher in the low frequencies. At 500 Hz 77 patients had an identifiable preoperative pure tone threshold, still identifiable postoperatively in 48. At 4 kHz only 25 patients had an identifiable preoperative threshold, preserved in 9, and at 8 kHz 6 of 13 patients still had identifiable pure tone thresholds postoperatively. There was no correlation between the depth of insertion and hearing preservation, both groups having a mean of 5 stiffening rings inserted in addition to the 22 active electrodes. The mean deterioration in threshold in those who had residual hearing was 15 dB at 500 Hz, and in 29 patients the deterioration in the threshold was less than 15 dB.
Insertion of a full conventional electrode array is not as damaging to cochlear function as often assumed. Residual low-frequency hearing may be preserved in approximately two-thirds of patients 6 months postoperatively. This study supports our counselling patients that despite the delicate nature of the inner ear there is a significant chance that their air conduction hearing will not be lost.
临床医生传统上告知患者,植入传统的全耳蜗植入阵列会导致植入耳中任何残余听力丧失。我们试图评估全电极阵列的“标准”插入对耳蜗功能的影响程度。
对81例术前有可识别纯音阈值的成年患者进行气导纯音听力测定,作为植入后6个月常规听力评估的一部分。所有患者均植入了Nucleus CI24设备,其中68例患者完全插入了直阵列,13例患者插入了轮廓阵列。使用1毫米金刚石磨头在圆窗前制作单独的耳蜗造口术,阵列在无润滑的情况下插入。手术时,主刀医生对本研究纳入的患者不知情。
81例患者中,58例在6个月时保留了一些残余听力。低频听力保留率更高。在500赫兹时,77例患者术前有可识别的纯音阈值,术后仍有48例可识别。在4千赫兹时,只有25例患者术前有可识别的阈值,术后9例保留,在8千赫兹时,13例患者中有6例术后仍有可识别的纯音阈值。插入深度与听力保留之间没有相关性,两组除22个有源电极外平均还插入了5个加强环。有残余听力的患者阈值平均恶化在500赫兹时为15分贝,29例患者阈值恶化小于15分贝。
插入传统的全电极阵列对耳蜗功能的损害并不像通常认为的那样大。大约三分之二的患者在术后6个月可能保留残余低频听力。这项研究支持我们向患者提供的咨询,即尽管内耳性质脆弱,但他们的气导听力仍有很大机会不会丧失。