Division of Brain Stimulation and Therapeutic Modulation, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Schizophr Res. 2011 Sep;131(1-3):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
Patients with schizophrenia have a decreased ability to interpret the intentions of other individuals, called Theory of Mind (ToM). As capacity for ToM normally advances with brain maturation, research on ToM in individuals at heightened clinical risk for psychosis may reveal developmental differences independent of disease based differences.
We examined ToM in at clinical high risk and schizophrenia patients as well as healthy controls: 1) 63 clinical high risk (CHR) patients and 24 normal youths ascertained by a CHR program; and 2) in 13 schizophrenia cases and 14 normal adults recruited through a schizophrenia program. ToM measures included first- and second-order false belief cartoon tasks (FBT) and two "higher order" tasks ("Strange Stories Task" (SST) and the "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" task). In the first study, CHR patients and normal youths were also assessed for cognition, "prodromal" symptoms and social function.
Errors on first- and second-order false belief tasks were made primarily by patients. CHR patients and their young comparison group had equivalent performance on higher order ToM, which was not significantly different from the worse ToM performance of schizophrenia patients and the higher performance of normal adult controls. In the combined dataset from both studies, all levels of ToM were associated with IQ, controlling for age and sex. ToM bore no relation to explicit memory, prodromal symptoms, social function, or later transition to psychosis.
Higher order ToM capacity was equally undeveloped in high risk cases and younger controls, suggesting that performance on these tasks is not fully achieved until adulthood. This study also replicates the association of IQ with ToM performance described in previous studies of schizophrenia.
精神分裂症患者解读他人意图的能力下降,这种能力被称为心理理论(Theory of Mind,ToM)。由于心理理论能力通常随着大脑成熟而提高,因此对处于精神病高危状态的个体进行心理理论研究可能会揭示出与疾病无关的、基于发展的差异。
我们对处于精神病高危状态的个体、精神分裂症患者以及健康对照者进行了心理理论测试:1)共纳入 63 名临床高风险(CHR)患者和 24 名通过 CHR 项目确定的正常青少年;2)纳入了 13 名精神分裂症患者和 14 名通过精神分裂症项目招募的正常成年人。心理理论测试包括一级和二级错误信念卡通任务(FBT)和两个“更高阶”任务(“Strange Stories Task”(SST)和“Reading the Mind in the Eyes”任务)。在第一项研究中,CHR 患者和正常青少年还接受了认知、“前驱”症状和社会功能评估。
一级和二级错误信念任务的错误主要由患者做出。CHR 患者及其年轻对照组在高阶心理理论任务上的表现相当,与精神分裂症患者较差的心理理论表现和正常成年对照组较高的心理理论表现均无显著差异。在两项研究的合并数据集里,所有心理理论水平都与智商相关,与年龄和性别无关。心理理论与外显记忆、前驱症状、社会功能或以后向精神病转变无关。
高危病例和年轻对照组的高阶心理理论能力同样未充分发展,这表明这些任务的表现直到成年后才完全达到。本研究还复制了之前在精神分裂症研究中描述的智商与心理理论表现之间的关联。