Suppr超能文献

激动剂与特定β-arrestin 的定向相互作用决定了μ-阿片受体的转运、泛素化和去磷酸化。

Agonist-directed interactions with specific beta-arrestins determine mu-opioid receptor trafficking, ubiquitination, and dephosphorylation.

机构信息

Department of Molecular Therapeutics, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, Florida 33458, USA.

出版信息

J Biol Chem. 2011 Sep 9;286(36):31731-41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.248310. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

Abstract

Morphine and other opiates mediate their effects through activation of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR), and regulation of the MOR has been shown to critically affect receptor responsiveness. Activation of the MOR results in receptor phosphorylation, β-arrestin recruitment, and internalization. This classical regulatory process can differ, depending on the ligand occupying the receptor. There are two forms of β-arrestin, β-arrestin1 and β-arrestin2 (also known as arrestin2 and arrestin3, respectively); however, most studies have focused on the consequences of recruiting β-arrestin2 specifically. In this study, we examine the different contributions of β-arrestin1- and β-arrestin2-mediated regulation of the MOR by comparing MOR agonists in cells that lack expression of individual or both β-arrestins. Here we show that morphine only recruits β-arrestin2, whereas the MOR-selective enkephalin [D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO), recruits either β-arrestin. We show that β-arrestins are required for receptor internalization and that only β-arrestin2 can rescue morphine-induced MOR internalization, whereas either β-arrestin can rescue DAMGO-induced MOR internalization. DAMGO activation of the receptor promotes MOR ubiquitination over time. Interestingly, β-arrestin1 proves to be critical for MOR ubiquitination as modification does not occur in the absence of β-arrestin1 nor when morphine occupies the receptor. Moreover, the selective interactions between the MOR and β-arrestin1 facilitate receptor dephosphorylation, which may play a role in the resensitization of the MOR and thereby contribute to overall development of opioid tolerance.

摘要

吗啡和其他阿片类药物通过激活μ-阿片受体(MOR)发挥作用,并且已经证明对 MOR 的调节会严重影响受体的反应性。MOR 的激活导致受体磷酸化、β-抑制蛋白募集和内化。这种经典的调节过程可能因占据受体的配体而异。β-抑制蛋白有两种形式,β-抑制蛋白 1 和 β-抑制蛋白 2(也分别称为抑制蛋白 2 和抑制蛋白 3);然而,大多数研究都集中在专门募集β-抑制蛋白 2 的后果上。在这项研究中,我们通过比较缺乏单个或两个β-抑制蛋白表达的细胞中 MOR 激动剂,研究了β-抑制蛋白 1 和β-抑制蛋白 2 介导的 MOR 调节的不同贡献。在这里,我们显示吗啡仅募集β-抑制蛋白 2,而 MOR 选择性脑啡肽 [D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]脑啡肽(DAMGO)募集任何一种β-抑制蛋白。我们表明β-抑制蛋白是受体内化所必需的,并且只有β-抑制蛋白 2 可以挽救吗啡诱导的 MOR 内化,而任何一种β-抑制蛋白都可以挽救 DAMGO 诱导的 MOR 内化。DAMGO 激活受体导致 MOR 随时间发生泛素化。有趣的是,β-抑制蛋白 1 被证明对 MOR 泛素化至关重要,因为在没有β-抑制蛋白 1 的情况下或吗啡占据受体时,修饰不会发生。此外,MOR 和β-抑制蛋白 1 之间的选择性相互作用促进了受体去磷酸化,这可能在 MOR 的重新敏化中发挥作用,并有助于阿片类药物耐受的整体发展。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
GPCR targeting of E3 ubiquitin ligase MDM2 by inactive β-arrestin.E3 泛素连接酶 MDM2 被无活性β-arrestin 靶向的 GPCR。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jul 11;120(28):e2301934120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301934120. Epub 2023 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

7
G protein-coupled receptor sorting to endosomes and lysosomes.G蛋白偶联受体向内体和溶酶体的分选
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;48:601-29. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094646.
9
Seven-transmembrane receptors and ubiquitination.七跨膜受体与泛素化
Circ Res. 2007 Apr 27;100(8):1142-54. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000261939.88744.5a.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验