Department of Surgery, Burn and Shock Trauma Institute, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois 60153, USA.
J Biol Chem. 2011 Sep 23;286(38):33466-77. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.233742. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
Recently, we identified extracellular ubiquitin as an endogenous CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR) 4 agonist. However, the receptor selectivity and molecular basis of the CXCR4 agonist activity of ubiquitin are unknown, and functional consequences of CXCR4 activation with ubiquitin are poorly defined. Here, we provide evidence that ubiquitin and the cognate CXCR4 ligand stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1α do not share CXCR7 as a receptor. We further demonstrate that ubiquitin does not utilize the typical two-site binding mechanism of chemokine-receptor interactions, in which the receptor N terminus is important for ligand binding. CXCR4 activation with ubiquitin and SDF-1α lead to similar Gα(i)-responses and to a comparable magnitude of phosphorylation of ERK-1/2, p90 ribosomal S6 kinase-l and Akt, although phosphorylations occur more transiently after activation with ubiquitin. Despite the similarity of signal transduction events after activation of CXCR4 with both ligands, ubiquitin possesses weaker chemotactic activity than SDF-lα in cell migration assays and does not interfere with productive entry of HIV-1 into P4.R5 multinuclear activation of galactosidase indicator cells. Unlike SDF-1α, ubiquitin lacks interactions with an N-terminal CXCR4 peptide in NMR spectroscopy experiments. Binding and signaling studies in the presence of antibodies against the N terminus and extracellular loops 2/3 of CXCR4 confirm that the ubiquitin CXCR4 interaction is independent of the N-terminal receptor domain, whereas blockade of extracellular loops 2/3 prevents receptor binding and activation. Our findings define ubiquitin as a CXCR4 agonist, which does not interfere with productive cellular entry of HIV-1, and provide new mechanistic insights into interactions between CXCR4 and its natural ligands.
最近,我们发现细胞外泛素是一种内源性 CXC 趋化因子受体 (CXCR)4 激动剂。然而,泛素作为 CXCR4 激动剂的受体选择性和分子基础尚不清楚,泛素激活 CXCR4 的功能后果也知之甚少。在这里,我们提供的证据表明,泛素和同源 CXCR4 配体基质细胞衍生因子 (SDF)-1α 并不共享 CXCR7 作为受体。我们进一步证明,泛素不利用趋化因子-受体相互作用的典型双位点结合机制,其中受体 N 端对于配体结合很重要。泛素和 SDF-1α 激活 CXCR4 导致类似的 Gα(i)-反应和 ERK-1/2、p90 核糖体 S6 激酶-l 和 Akt 的磷酸化程度相当,尽管磷酸化在激活后更短暂。尽管激活 CXCR4 后信号转导事件相似,但在细胞迁移测定中,泛素的趋化活性比 SDF-1α 弱,并且不会干扰 HIV-1 进入 P4.R5 多核激活半乳糖苷酶指示细胞的过程。与 SDF-1α 不同,泛素在 NMR 光谱实验中缺乏与 CXCR4 N 端肽的相互作用。在针对 CXCR4 N 端和细胞外环 2/3 的抗体存在的情况下进行的结合和信号转导研究证实,泛素与 CXCR4 的相互作用独立于受体的 N 端结构域,而细胞外环 2/3 的阻断可防止受体结合和激活。我们的研究结果将泛素定义为 CXCR4 激动剂,它不干扰 HIV-1 的有效细胞进入,并为 CXCR4 与其天然配体之间的相互作用提供了新的机制见解。