• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外伤性鼓膜穿孔边缘鼓膜瓣的预后及转归

Prognosis and outcome of the tympanic membrane flap at traumatic tympanic membrane perforation edge.

作者信息

Lou Zheng-Cai, Hu Yun-Xing, Tang Yong-Mei

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yiwu Central Hospital, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2011;73(4):212-8. doi: 10.1159/000329705. Epub 2011 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1159/000329705
PMID:21757967
Abstract

This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the prognosis and outcome of tympanic membrane perforations with a particular focus on the fate of the perforation edge flaps.Chart records of 329 patients with a single ear traumatic tympanic membrane perforation were retrieved and analyzed. Of these patients, 70 were left to heal spontaneously, 93 received gelatin sponge patching treatment and 114 were subjected to otoendoscopic eardrum repair before gelatin sponge patching. The complete perforation closure rate at 3 months was 94.29% (66/70), 98.92% (92/93) and 98.24% (112/114) in the 3 groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.608). The mean closure time was 28.2 ± 3.6 days in the spontaneous healing group, which was significantly longer than that in the sponge patching group (11.1 ± 2.1 days, p = 0.0017) and in the eardrum repair + sponge patching group (12.5 ± 1.9 days, p = 0.0032), while there was no significant difference between the 2 gelatin sponge patching groups (p = 1.86). The hearing ability improved in the 3 groups (6.4 ± 0.83, 7.2 ± 1.65 and 9.6 ± 2.37 dB, respectively), with no statistically significant difference (p >0.05). In the gelatin sponge patching group, new tympanic membrane tissue of the eardrum flap edge proliferated, and the contour of the eardrum flap was not obvious. In the eardrum flap repair group, the eardrum flap retracted to the perforation edge. In conclusion, the eardrum flap of the perforation edge does not have any obvious effect on the perforation closure so that it is unnecessary to conduct an intervention procedure on the flap in the clinical treatment.

摘要

本研究旨在回顾性评估鼓膜穿孔的预后及转归,特别关注穿孔边缘皮瓣的转归情况。检索并分析了329例单耳外伤性鼓膜穿孔患者的病历记录。其中,70例患者任其自行愈合,93例接受了明胶海绵修补治疗,114例在明胶海绵修补前接受了耳内镜下鼓膜修补术。3组患者在3个月时的完全穿孔闭合率分别为94.29%(66/70)、98.92%(92/93)和98.24%(112/114),差异无统计学意义(p = 0.608)。自行愈合组的平均闭合时间为28.2±3.6天,显著长于海绵修补组(11.1±2.1天,p = 0.0017)和鼓膜修补+海绵修补组(12.5±1.9天,p = 0.0032),而两个明胶海绵修补组之间差异无统计学意义(p = 1.86)。3组患者的听力均有改善(分别为6.4±0.83、7.2±1.65和9.6±2.37 dB),差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。在明胶海绵修补组中,鼓膜皮瓣边缘有新的鼓膜组织增生,鼓膜皮瓣轮廓不明显。在鼓膜皮瓣修补组中,鼓膜皮瓣回缩至穿孔边缘。综上所述,穿孔边缘的鼓膜皮瓣对穿孔闭合无明显影响,因此在临床治疗中无需对皮瓣进行干预操作。

相似文献

1
Prognosis and outcome of the tympanic membrane flap at traumatic tympanic membrane perforation edge.外伤性鼓膜穿孔边缘鼓膜瓣的预后及转归
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2011;73(4):212-8. doi: 10.1159/000329705. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
2
Outcome of children with edge-everted traumatic tympanic membrane perforations following spontaneous healing versus fibroblast growth factor-containing gelfoam patching with or without edge repair.自发性愈合与含成纤维细胞生长因子的明胶海绵修补(有无边缘修复)后外伤性鼓膜边缘外翻穿孔患儿的预后
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Oct;75(10):1285-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
3
A randomised controlled trial comparing spontaneous healing, gelfoam patching and edge-approximation plus gelfoam patching in traumatic tympanic membrane perforation with inverted or everted edges.一项比较创伤性鼓膜穿孔伴内翻或外翻边缘时自发愈合、明胶海绵贴补和边缘接近加明胶海绵贴补的随机对照试验。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Jun;36(3):221-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02319.x.
4
Effect of treatment at different time intervals for traumatic tympanic membrane perforation on the closure.不同时间间隔治疗对创伤性鼓膜穿孔愈合的影响。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2011 Oct;131(10):1032-9. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2011.581695. Epub 2011 May 19.
5
Relation between eardrum flap area and healing outcome of traumatic eardrum perforation.鼓膜瓣面积与外伤性鼓膜穿孔愈合结果的关系。
Chin J Traumatol. 2011;14(5):264-9.
6
Traumatic tympanic membrane perforations: a study of etiology and factors affecting outcome.外伤性鼓膜穿孔:病因学研究及影响预后的因素。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2012 Sep-Oct;33(5):549-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
7
A prospective study evaluating spontaneous healing of aetiology, size and type-different groups of traumatic tympanic membrane perforation.一项前瞻性研究评估了创伤性鼓膜穿孔的病因、大小和类型不同组别的自发愈合情况。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Oct;36(5):450-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02387.x.
8
Repair of large traumatic tympanic membrane perforation using ofloxacin otic solution and gelatin sponge.氧氟沙星滴耳液联合明胶海绵修复外伤性鼓膜大穿孔
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jan-Feb;88(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 May 5.
9
Comparison between transtympanic and elevation of tympanomeatal flap approaches in tympanoplasty.鼓室成形术中经鼓膜和鼓室成形术鼓室乳突瓣抬高术的比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jul;31(5):773-5. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181e40a41.
10
Spontaneous healing of traumatic eardrum perforation: outward epithelial cell migration and clinical outcome.外伤性鼓膜穿孔的自发愈合:外向上皮细胞迁移与临床转归。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Dec;147(6):1114-9. doi: 10.1177/0194599812456813. Epub 2012 Aug 6.