儿童高频纯音测听:与耳毒性标准相关的测试-重测信度研究。

High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.

机构信息

Hearing Research Unit for Children, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):104-11. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318228a77d.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Good test-retest reliability of high frequency (≥ 8 kHz) pure-tone audiometry (HFPTA) is essential to detect significant changes in hearing threshold caused by ototoxicity. While the test-retest reliability of HFPTA in adults has been extensively studied, such investigations in children are scant. This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the HFPTA in normal-hearing children with particular reference to the criteria for ototoxicity.

DESIGN

Participants were 125 children aged between 4 and 13 yr, with normal hearing in the 0.25 to 4 kHz range and normal tympanometric findings. The participants were divided into three age groups, 4 to 6 yr (16M; 16F); 7 to 9 yr (22M; 30F); and 10 to 13 yr (24M; 17F), for investigating possible age effects in the test-retest reliability of HFPTA. The instrumentation for the HFPTA procedure was an Interacoustics AC40 audiometer with Koss R/80 high-frequency headphones, calibrated to meet Australian standards. Hearing thresholds at 8, 9, 10, 11.2, 12.5, 14, and 16 kHz were measured in a sound-treated chamber using a modified Hughson-Westlake procedure with a 5 dB step size. Testing began with an ear and test frequency selected at random; the subsequent test frequencies were randomly selected. After acquisition of hearing threshold data at all frequencies, the other ear was tested using the same procedure. After the first HFPTA test, the headphones were removed and carefully replaced. A second HFPTA test was performed with the ear order reversed. The order of testing the ear for the next participant was reversed.

RESULTS

Good test-retest reliability of HFPTA was achieved with no significant difference in mean HFPTA thresholds across test and retest conditions for all age groups. An age effect in the test-retest reliability of HFPTA was evident with the 4- to 6-yr-old, 7- to 9-yr-old, and 10- to 13-yr-old children demonstrating normal variability of thresholds (within ±10 dB) in 89.9%, 93.0%, and 97% of ears tested, respectively. When the variability of test-retest thresholds was assessed at each frequency, the 4 to 6 yr group showed significantly lower percentage of normal variability at 14 kHz. In identifying significant deterioration of hearing thresholds across test-retest conditions in relation to the ASHA (1994) ototoxicity criteria, the three age groups (youngest to oldest) demonstrated false-positive rates of 24.6%, 11%, and 7.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

: Overall, this study demonstrated high test-retest reliability of HFPTA in all but the 4 to 6 yr group. With a false-positive rate of 24.6% for ototoxicity for the youngest group, it is recommended that the HFPTA should not be used alone in assessing the possibility of a genuine threshold shift for this age group. If possible, the HFPTA should be supplemented with an objective test of auditory function to confirm the diagnosis. For children aged 7 yr or older, the HFPTA test is promising as a useful tool to identify hearing impairment in the extended high-frequency range (>8 kHz). However, interpretation of HFPTA findings in serial testing for monitoring hearing in a child should be made with due attention being given to the frequency of the stimulus, age of the child, and the associated nonzero false-positive rates.

摘要

目的

高频(≥8kHz)纯音听力测试(HFPTA)具有良好的复测信度,对于检测耳毒性引起的听力阈值的显著变化至关重要。尽管成人高频听力测试的复测信度已经得到了广泛的研究,但在儿童中的此类研究却很少。本研究旨在评估正常听力儿童高频听力测试的复测信度,并特别参考耳毒性的标准。

设计

参与者为 125 名年龄在 4 至 13 岁之间的儿童,0.25 至 4kHz 频率范围内听力正常,鼓室图正常。参与者被分为三个年龄组,4 至 6 岁(16 名男性;16 名女性);7 至 9 岁(22 名男性;30 名女性);10 至 13 岁(24 名男性;17 名女性),以研究高频听力测试复测信度在不同年龄组中的可能影响。HFPTA 程序的仪器为 Interacoustics AC40 听力计和 Koss R/80 高频耳机,经校准符合澳大利亚标准。在隔音室内,采用改良的 Hughson-Westlake 程序,以 5dB 的步长,测试 8、9、10、11.2、12.5、14 和 16kHz 的听力阈值。测试开始时,随机选择一只耳朵和测试频率;随后的测试频率随机选择。在所有频率的听力阈值数据采集完成后,用相同的程序测试另一只耳朵。在第一次 HFPTA 测试后,取下耳机并小心更换。用相反的耳序进行第二次 HFPTA 测试。下一个参与者的测试耳序相反。

结果

所有年龄组的测试和复测条件下,HFPTA 均具有良好的复测信度,平均 HFPTA 阈值无显著差异。高频听力测试复测信度存在年龄效应,4 至 6 岁、7 至 9 岁和 10 至 13 岁的儿童在测试的耳朵中,分别有 89.9%、93.0%和 97%的阈值变异在±10dB 范围内,显示出正常的变异性。当在每个频率评估测试-复测阈值的变异性时,4 至 6 岁组在 14kHz 时显示出明显较低的正常变异性百分比。根据 ASHA(1994)耳毒性标准,在与测试-复测条件相关的听力阈值显著恶化的情况下,三个年龄组(从最小到最大)的假阳性率分别为 24.6%、11%和 7.6%。

结论

总体而言,本研究表明 HFPTA 在所有年龄组中均具有较高的复测信度,但在 4 至 6 岁组中复测信度较低。对于年龄最小的组,耳毒性的假阳性率为 24.6%,因此建议在评估该年龄组是否存在真正的阈值变化时,不应单独使用 HFPTA。如果可能,HFPTA 应辅以客观的听觉功能测试,以确认诊断。对于 7 岁或以上的儿童,HFPTA 测试有望成为一种有用的工具,可用于识别扩展高频范围(>8kHz)的听力障碍。然而,在对儿童进行连续测试以监测听力时,应注意刺激的频率、儿童的年龄以及相关的非零假阳性率,对 HFPTA 结果进行解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索