• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸下段食管癌患者腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的意义。

The significance of abdominal para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2012 Feb;25(2):146-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01222.x. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01222.x
PMID:21762280
Abstract

Para-aortic lymph node (PALN) recurrence is often seen in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer treated by esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection. However, the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with PALN metastasis and the significance of PALN dissection are unknown. A total of 283 patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy at our hospital between April 1984 and March 2007. Among these 283 patients, 60 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study according to following criteria: (i) clinical T2 to T4 tumor, (ii) no clinical PALN metastasis, and (iii) received PALN dissection. PALN dissection was indicated by a tumor depth of at least T2 and no severe complications. The clinicopathological data, recurrence pattern, and overall survival were compared between patients with PALN and without PALN metastasis. The mean length of surgery was 587 min and the mean blood loss was 1383 mL. The morbidity was 33.3% and mortality was 5% in this series. Sixteen patients (26.7%) had PALN metastasis; these showed significantly more lymph node metastases (15.8 ± 13.2 vs. 3.0 ± 3.2, P < 0.0001) and significantly worse survival rates (53.3% vs. 79.9% at 1 year, 6.7% vs. 62.0% at 3 years, P < 0.0001) than patients without PALN metastasis. The incidence of lymph node recurrence (P < 0.0001) and hematogenous recurrence (P= 0.0487) was also higher in patients with PALN metastasis than in patients without PALN metastasis. Among the 16 patients with PALN metastasis, a univariate analysis revealed total number of metastatic nodes < 8 (P= 0.0325) to be a significant prognostic factor. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of the regional lymph nodes identified the invasion of the lower mediastinal nodes (hazard ratio = 6.120) and retroperitoneal nodes (hazard ratio = 15.167) to be significantly correlated with PALN metastasis. PALN metastasis is suggested to be related to the systemic spread of lymphatic metastasis even in lower thoracic esophageal cancer. PALN dissection for pathological PALN(+) patients should not be performed. It remains to be determined in future prospective studies whether patients without pathological PALN metastasis, but showing PALN micrometastasis, could achieve improved survival with PALN dissection.

摘要

para-aortic 淋巴结 (PALN) 复发在接受食管癌根治术伴扩大淋巴结清扫术的患者中较为常见。然而,PALN 转移患者的临床病理特征以及 PALN 清扫的意义尚不清楚。

1984 年 4 月至 2007 年 3 月期间,我院共有 283 例胸下段食管癌患者接受了食管癌根治术伴淋巴结清扫术。在这 283 例患者中,根据以下标准选择 60 例患者进行回顾性研究:(i)临床 T2 至 T4 肿瘤,(ii)无临床 PALN 转移,(iii)接受 PALN 清扫。PALN 清扫指征为肿瘤深度至少 T2 且无严重并发症。比较有和无 PALN 转移患者的临床病理资料、复发模式和总生存率。

本系列手术平均时间为 587 分钟,平均出血量为 1383ml。该系列的发病率为 33.3%,死亡率为 5%。16 例(26.7%)患者有 PALN 转移;这些患者的淋巴结转移明显更多(15.8±13.2 比 3.0±3.2,P<0.0001),生存率明显更差(1 年时 53.3%比 79.9%,3 年时 6.7%比 62.0%,P<0.0001)。与无 PALN 转移患者相比,有 PALN 转移患者的淋巴结复发(P<0.0001)和血行复发(P=0.0487)发生率也更高。

在 16 例有 PALN 转移的患者中,单因素分析显示转移淋巴结总数<8 个(P=0.0325)是一个显著的预后因素。对区域淋巴结的多因素 logistic 回归分析显示,下纵隔淋巴结(危险比=6.120)和腹膜后淋巴结(危险比=15.167)侵犯与 PALN 转移显著相关。

即使在胸下段食管癌中,PALN 转移也提示与淋巴转移的全身扩散有关。对于病理 PALN(+)患者,不建议进行 PALN 清扫。在未来的前瞻性研究中,还需要确定是否无病理 PALN 转移但显示 PALN 微转移的患者进行 PALN 清扫能否提高生存率。

相似文献

1
The significance of abdominal para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer.胸下段食管癌患者腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的意义。
Dis Esophagus. 2012 Feb;25(2):146-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01222.x. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
2
Pattern of lymph node metastases in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus who underwent three-field lymphadenectomy.接受三野淋巴结清扫术的胸段食管癌患者的淋巴结转移模式
Eur Surg Res. 2007;39(1):1-6. doi: 10.1159/000096925. Epub 2006 Nov 10.
3
[Feasibility and safety of radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy in thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].[胸腔镜食管癌根治术中纵隔淋巴结清扫的可行性与安全性]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Nov;34(11):855-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.11.013.
4
Intraoperative pathological investigation of recurrent nerve nodal metastasis can guide the decision whether to perform cervical lymph node dissection in thoracic esophageal cancer.术中对喉返神经旁淋巴结转移情况进行病理检查,可指导胸段食管癌是否行颈部淋巴结清扫的决策。
Oncol Rep. 2006 Nov;16(5):1061-6.
5
[Analysis of the survival in patients after surgical resection of thoracic esophageal cancer].[胸段食管癌手术切除术后患者的生存分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Jul;31(7):541-5.
6
[Regulations and lymphadenectomy strategy of mediastinal and upper abdominal lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma].[胸段食管癌纵隔及上腹部淋巴结转移的相关规定及淋巴结清扫策略]
Ai Zheng. 2007 Sep;26(9):1020-4.
7
Can common hepatic artery lymph node dissection be safely omitted in surgery for clinical T1N0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?临床 T1N0 胸段食管鳞癌手术中能否安全省略肝总动脉淋巴结清扫术?
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Apr;26(3):272-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01361.x. Epub 2012 May 29.
8
Characteristics and clinical significance of lymph node metastases near the recurrent laryngeal nerve from thoracic esophageal carcinoma.胸段食管癌喉返神经旁淋巴结转移的特征及临床意义
Genet Mol Res. 2014 Aug 25;13(3):6411-9. doi: 10.4238/2014.August.25.4.
9
Can superextended lymph node dissection be justified for gastric cancer with pathologically positive para-aortic lymph nodes?对于病理上阳性的腹主动脉旁淋巴结的胃癌,可以进行超级扩大淋巴结清扫吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Aug;17(8):2031-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0969-4. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
10
Number and location of positive nodes, postoperative radiotherapy, and survival after esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.胸段食管鳞癌三野淋巴结清扫术后阳性淋巴结数目和部位、术后放疗与生存
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.037. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome of Conversion Surgery After Induction Therapy for Esophageal Cancer with Synchronous Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study.同步主动脉旁淋巴结转移的食管癌诱导治疗后转换手术的结果:一项多机构回顾性研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18042-w.
2
Efficiency of conversion surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with solitary abdominal para-aortic lymph node metastasis.手术治疗食管鳞癌合并孤立性腹腔主动脉旁淋巴结转移的效率。
Surg Today. 2024 Dec;54(12):1490-1497. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02872-4. Epub 2024 May 27.
3
Role of Lower Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Margin Location on Abdominal Lymph Node Metastasis Risk.
食管下段鳞状细胞癌切缘位置对腹部淋巴结转移风险的作用。
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 3;12(7):2657. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072657.
4
Para-aortic lymph node metastasis in lower Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Radical Esophagectomy: a CT-based atlas and its clinical implications for Adjuvant Radiotherapy.胸段下段食管鳞状细胞癌根治性食管切除术后主动脉旁淋巴结转移:基于CT的图谱及其对辅助放疗的临床意义
J Cancer. 2021 Jan 18;12(6):1734-1741. doi: 10.7150/jca.51212. eCollection 2021.
5
Pattern of lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with poor differentiation.低分化胸段食管鳞状细胞癌的淋巴结转移模式
Mol Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun;8(6):760-766. doi: 10.3892/mco.2018.1606. Epub 2018 Apr 13.