Suppr超能文献

窄带成像与 I-Scan 实时预测小体积结肠息肉的组织学特征:采用简单统一内镜分类的前瞻性对比研究。

Narrow-band imaging versus I-Scan for the real-time histological prediction of diminutive colonic polyps: a prospective comparative study by using the simple unified endoscopic classification.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):603-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.049. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital chromoendoscopy (DCE) has the potential for the in vivo optical diagnosis of colon polyps. However, no comparison of different DCE technologies currently exists.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic efficacies of narrow-band imaging (NBI) with those of I-Scan for the real-time histological prediction of diminutive colonic polyps (DCPs) (≤5 mm) by using the simple unified endoscopic classification.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic hospital.

PATIENTS

In total, 296 DCPs from 142 patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy were assessed.

INTERVENTIONS

All DCPs detected during withdrawal were evaluated for the surface details by using high-definition white-light colonoscopy, and thereafter by using DCE (NBI or I-Scan) without optical magnification. The histology of all polyps was predicted in real-time and confirmed through the evaluation of biopsy or polypectomy specimens.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Diagnostic efficacies of NBI and I-Scan.

RESULTS

NBI and I-Scan displayed a significantly higher sensitivity and improved accuracy compared with high-definition white-light colonoscopy for the prediction of adenomas (P < .05). No significant differences were evident between the NBI and I-Scan (sensitivity, 88.8% vs 94.6%; specificity, 86.8% vs 86.4%; accuracy, 87.8% vs 90.7%, respectively; P > .05). Additionally, substantial levels of intra- and interobserver agreement between the NBI and I-Scan were measured (κ values >0.7).

LIMITATIONS

No randomized or crossover design.

CONCLUSIONS

NBI and I-Scan displayed a similar efficacy for the real-time histological prediction of DCPs. The simple unified endoscopic classification can be used for the interpretation of DCE, regardless of the type of technology. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT1133041.).

摘要

背景

数字染色内镜(DCE)具有对结肠息肉进行体内光学诊断的潜力。然而,目前尚无对不同 DCE 技术进行比较的研究。

目的

通过使用简单的统一内镜分类,比较窄带成像(NBI)与 I-Scan 实时组织学预测微小结肠息肉(DCPs)(≤5mm)的诊断效果。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

设置

学术医院。

患者

共评估了 142 名接受筛查或监测结肠镜检查的患者中的 296 个 DCP。

干预措施

所有在退镜过程中发现的 DCP 均使用高清白光结肠镜检查评估表面细节,然后不使用光学放大进行 DCE(NBI 或 I-Scan)检查。实时预测所有息肉的组织学,并通过评估活检或息肉切除术标本进行确认。

主要观察指标

NBI 和 I-Scan 的诊断效果。

结果

与高清白光结肠镜相比,NBI 和 I-Scan 对预测腺瘤的敏感性和准确性均显著提高(P<.05)。NBI 和 I-Scan 之间无显著差异(敏感性分别为 88.8%和 94.6%;特异性分别为 86.8%和 86.4%;准确性分别为 87.8%和 90.7%;P>.05)。此外,NBI 和 I-Scan 之间的观察者内和观察者间一致性水平较高(κ 值>0.7)。

局限性

无随机或交叉设计。

结论

NBI 和 I-Scan 对实时组织学预测 DCP 具有相似的效果。无论技术类型如何,简单的统一内镜分类都可用于 DCE 的解释。(临床研究注册号:NCT1133041)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验