Kang Hae Yeon, Kim Young Sun, Kang Seung Joo, Chung Goh Eun, Song Ji Hyun, Yang Sun Young, Lim Seon Hee, Kim Donghee, Kim Joo Sung
Department of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, 737 Yeoksam-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-984, South Korea.
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Sep;60(9):2777-84. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3661-5. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
There are limited data on the performance of narrow band imaging (NBI) and Fujinon intelligent color enhancement (FICE) for differentiating polyp histologies.
The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performances of NBI and FICE in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps <10 mm during screening colonoscopy.
A total of 955 average-risk adults undergoing screening colonoscopies were randomly allocated to NBI or FICE groups. Four board-certified staff endoscopists without prior experience using NBI or FICE participated. The main outcomes of this study were overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of FICE and NBI in identifying neoplastic polyps.
There was no significant difference in the number of subjects with adenoma between the NBI (143/475, 30.1 %) and FICE groups (139/480, 29.0 %) (after excluding adenoma ≥1 cm) (P > 0.05). The overall accuracy of NBI was 81.0 %, compared with 81.4 % for FICE (P = 0.867). The overall sensitivity and specificity of NBI and FICE were 84.6 and 78.0 % (P = 0.054); 75.1 and 86.5 % (P = 0.009), respectively. For polyps measuring ≤5 mm, the accuracy was 79.4 % for NBI and 80.1 % for FICE (P = 0.835; sensitivity 81.9 vs. 74.5 %, P = 0.064; specificity 75.7 vs. 88.4 %, P = 0.006).
The overall accuracy of NBI and FICE was similar for differentiating small polyp histologies during screening colonoscopy. However, better results should be achieved before using NBI or FICE as real-time optical biopsy of colorectal polyps in screening colonoscopy.
关于窄带成像(NBI)和富士能智能色彩增强(FICE)在鉴别息肉组织学类型方面的表现,相关数据有限。
本研究旨在比较NBI和FICE在筛查结肠镜检查中鉴别直径<10 mm的结直肠肿瘤性息肉与非肿瘤性息肉的诊断性能。
总共955名接受筛查结肠镜检查的平均风险成年人被随机分配到NBI组或FICE组。四名具有执业资格且此前无使用NBI或FICE经验的内镜医师参与其中。本研究的主要结果是FICE和NBI在识别肿瘤性息肉方面的总体准确性、敏感性和特异性。
NBI组(143/475,30.1%)和FICE组(139/480,29.0%)(排除直径≥1 cm的腺瘤后)腺瘤患者数量无显著差异(P>0.05)。NBI的总体准确性为81.0%,而FICE为81.4%(P = 0.867)。NBI和FICE的总体敏感性和特异性分别为84.6%和78.0%(P = 0.054);75.1%和86.5%(P = 0.009)。对于直径≤5 mm的息肉,NBI的准确性为79.4%,FICE为80.1%(P = 0.835;敏感性81.9%对74.5%,P = 0.064;特异性75.7%对88.4%,P = 0.006)。
在筛查结肠镜检查中鉴别小息肉组织学类型时,NBI和FICE的总体准确性相似。然而,在将NBI或FICE用作筛查结肠镜检查中结直肠息肉的实时光学活检之前,应取得更好的结果。