Computer Science, Roskilde University, Universitetsvej 1, Roskilde, Denmark.
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Sep;80(9):618-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
Many emergency departments (EDs) are in a process of transitioning from dry-erase to electronic whiteboards. This study investigates differences in ED clinicians' perception and assessment of their electronic whiteboards across departments and staff groups and at two points in time.
We conducted a survey consisting of a questionnaire administered when electronic whiteboards were introduced and another questionnaire administered when they had been in use for 8-9 months. The survey involved two EDs and, for reasons of comparison, a paediatric department.
The ED respondents consider the whiteboard information important to their overview, and they approve of the introduction of electronic whiteboards. With the electronic whiteboards, the ED respondents experience a better overall overview of their work than with dry-erase whiteboards. They also experience that whiteboard information has to a larger extent become available where and when they need it. Conversely, the ED respondents' expectations toward the electronic whiteboards have not been fulfilled when it comes to keeping information current and obtaining improvements for the patients. The ED staff groups of physicians, nurses, and secretaries experience the electronic whiteboards differently. The physicians, for example, consider it faster and simpler than the nurses to find information on the electronic whiteboards. After extended use, multiple questionnaire items about achieved performance and required effort contribute to explaining the variation in the nurses' overall assessment of the whiteboards; for physicians and secretaries few items contribute to explaining the variation in their overall assessment. The respondents from the paediatric department perceive their whiteboards as less important to their overview and collaboration than the ED respondents.
The ED clinicians experience positive effects of electronic over dry-erase whiteboards. However, their assessment of electronic whiteboards depends on their staff group, evolves over time, and differs from that of paediatric clinicians. These results likely affect clinicians' acceptance of electronic whiteboards and their command of their work.
许多急诊科正在从使用可擦写白板过渡到使用电子白板。本研究旨在调查急诊科临床医生对电子白板的感知和评估在不同科室和员工群体以及两个时间点之间的差异。
我们进行了一项调查,包括在引入电子白板时进行的问卷调查和在使用 8-9 个月后进行的另一份问卷调查。该调查涉及两家急诊科,并为了比较的目的,还涉及一家儿科病房。
急诊科受访者认为白板信息对他们的总体情况很重要,并且他们赞成引入电子白板。使用电子白板后,急诊科受访者对他们的工作有了更好的整体了解,而不是使用可擦写白板。他们还发现,白板信息在他们需要的时间和地点更加可用。相反,在保持信息的实时性和为患者提供改进方面,急诊科受访者对电子白板的期望尚未得到满足。医生、护士和秘书等不同的急诊科员工群体对电子白板的体验不同。例如,医生认为在电子白板上查找信息比护士更快、更简单。经过长时间的使用,多项关于实现绩效和所需努力的问卷项目有助于解释护士对白板整体评估的差异;对于医生和秘书来说,很少有项目有助于解释他们整体评估的差异。儿科病房的受访者认为他们的白板对他们的总体情况和协作的重要性低于急诊科受访者。
急诊科临床医生体验到电子白板优于可擦写白板的积极效果。然而,他们对电子白板的评估取决于他们的员工群体,随着时间的推移而演变,并不同于儿科临床医生的评估。这些结果可能会影响临床医生对电子白板的接受程度和对工作的掌握程度。