Unit of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, 84105 Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Water Res. 2011 Oct 15;45(16):4827-36. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.06.023. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
The fates of several macrolide, sulphonamide, and trimethoprim antibiotics contained in the raw sewage of the Tel-Aviv wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) were investigated after the sewage was treated using either a full-scale conventional activated sludge (CAS) system coupled with a subsequent ultrafiltration (UF) step or a pilot membrane bioreactor (MBR) system. Antibiotics removal in the MBR system, once it achieved stable operation, was 15-42% higher than that of the CAS system. This advantage was reduced to a maximum of 20% when a UF was added to the CAS. It was hypothesized that the contribution of membrane separation (in both systems) to antibiotics removal was due either to sorption to biomass (rather than improvement in biodegradation) or to enmeshment in the membrane biofilm (since UF membrane pores are significantly larger than the contaminant molecules). Batch experiments with MBR biomass showed a markedly high potential for sorption of the tested antibiotics onto the biomass. Moreover, methanol extraction of MBR biomass released significant amounts of sorbed antibiotics. This finding implies that more attention must be devoted to the management of excess sludge.
研究了特拉维夫污水处理厂(WWTP)未经处理的污水中几种大环内酯类、磺胺类和甲氧苄啶抗生素在采用全规模传统活性污泥(CAS)系统与后续超滤(UF)步骤或中试膜生物反应器(MBR)系统处理后的命运。MBR 系统一旦达到稳定运行,其抗生素去除率比 CAS 系统高 15-42%。当在 CAS 中添加 UF 时,这一优势最多减少到 20%。假设膜分离(在这两种系统中)对抗生素去除的贡献要么是由于生物吸附(而不是生物降解的改善),要么是由于被膜生物膜截留(因为 UF 膜孔明显大于污染物分子)。用 MBR 生物量进行的批量实验表明,测试的抗生素对生物量的吸附潜力非常高。此外,MBR 生物量的甲醇萃取释放了大量被吸附的抗生素。这一发现意味着必须更加重视剩余污泥的管理。