Suppr超能文献

干预反应:预防与纠正学业困难

Response to Intervention: Preventing and Remediating Academic Difficulties.

作者信息

Fletcher Jack M, Vaughn Sharon

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston TX.

出版信息

Child Dev Perspect. 2009 Apr;3(1):30-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x.

Abstract

We address the advantages and challenges of service delivery models based on student response to intervention (RTI) for preventing and remediating academic difficulties and as data sources for identification for special education services. The primary goal of RTI models is improved academic and behavioral outcomes for all students. We review evidence for the processes underlying RTI, including screening and progress monitoring assessments, evidence-based interventions, and schoolwide coordination of multitiered instruction. We also discuss the secondary goal of RTI, which is to provide data for identification of learning disabilities (LDs). Incorporating instructional response into identification represents a controversial shift away from discrepancies in cognitive skills that have traditionally been a primary basis for LD identification. RTI processes potentially integrate general and special education and suggest new directions for research and public policy related to LDs, but the scaling issues in schools are significant and more research is needed on the use of RTI data for identification.

摘要

我们探讨了基于学生干预反应(RTI)的服务提供模式在预防和补救学业困难方面的优势与挑战,以及作为特殊教育服务鉴定数据源的情况。RTI模式的主要目标是提高所有学生的学业和行为成果。我们回顾了RTI背后的过程的证据,包括筛查和进展监测评估、循证干预以及全校范围内多层级教学的协调。我们还讨论了RTI的次要目标,即提供用于识别学习障碍(LD)的数据。将教学反应纳入鉴定代表了一种有争议的转变,即从传统上作为LD鉴定主要依据的认知技能差异转向。RTI过程有可能整合普通教育和特殊教育,并为与LD相关的研究和公共政策提出新方向,但学校中的规模问题很显著,并且需要更多关于使用RTI数据进行鉴定的研究。

相似文献

1
Response to Intervention: Preventing and Remediating Academic Difficulties.
Child Dev Perspect. 2009 Apr;3(1):30-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x.
2
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
4
A Snapshot of RTI Implementation a Decade Later: New Picture, Same Story.
J Learn Disabil. 2020 Sep/Oct;53(5):332-342. doi: 10.1177/0022219420915867. Epub 2020 May 28.
7
Response to intervention with secondary school students with reading difficulties.
J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):244-56. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442157. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
10
Service learning for improving academic success in students in grade K to 12: A systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 7;18(1):e1210. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1210. eCollection 2022 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Centering Students with Learning Disabilities in Intervention Research: Implications for Educational Theory.
Educ Psychol. 2025;60(3):154-171. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2025.2506991. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
2
Efficacy of a prewriting intervention: A pilot randomised control trial.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Aug;72(4):e70043. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70043.
3
Experienced Protective Factors While Growing up With Reading Disability.
Learn Disabil Q. 2024 Dec 13;48(3):173-187. doi: 10.1177/07319487241302309. eCollection 2025 Aug.
5
The Utility of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills as a Literacy Screener for Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.
Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2023 Oct;8(5):1011-1018. doi: 10.1044/2023_persp-23-00014. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
6
Identifying students with dyslexia: exploration of current assessment methods.
Ann Dyslexia. 2025 Apr;75(1):19-41. doi: 10.1007/s11881-024-00313-y. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
7
Predicting adult-age mental health with childhood reading and math disability: do resilience and coping styles matter?
Ann Dyslexia. 2024 Apr;74(1):97-122. doi: 10.1007/s11881-023-00290-8. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
8
Assessment of Specific Learning Disabilities and Intellectual Disabilities.
Assessment. 2024 Jan;31(1):53-74. doi: 10.1177/10731911231194992. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
9
The Use of Cognitive Tests in the Assessment of Dyslexia.
J Intell. 2023 Apr 26;11(5):79. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11050079.
10
A Register Study Suggesting Homotypic and Heterotypic Comorbidity Among Individuals With Learning Disabilities.
J Learn Disabil. 2024 Jan-Feb;57(1):30-42. doi: 10.1177/00222194221150230. Epub 2023 Feb 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Three Approaches to Supplementary Reading Instruction for Low-Achieving Second-Grade Readers.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2003 Apr 1;34(2):101-116. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2003/009).
2
Form effects on the estimation of students' oral reading fluency using DIBELS.
J Sch Psychol. 2008 Jun;46(3):315-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
3
An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties.
J Learn Disabil. 2006 Sep-Oct;39(5):447-66. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390050601.
4
Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD: IQ and achievement scores are not sufficient.
J Learn Disabil. 2005 Mar-Apr;38(2):98-108. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380020101.
7
Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;45(1):2-40. doi: 10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x.
8
A brief look at the learning disabilities movement in the United States.
J Learn Disabil. 1993 May;26(5):295-310. doi: 10.1177/002221949302600502.
9
The prevalence of specific arithmetic difficulties and specific reading difficulties in 9- to 10-year-old boys and girls.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;35(2):283-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01162.x.
10
IQ and reading progress: a test of the capacity notion of IQ.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1989 Jan;28(1):97-100. doi: 10.1097/00004583-198901000-00018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验