• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究性分析评估 1 型糖尿病青少年治疗依从性和血糖控制的不同方法之间的关系。

Exploratory analysis of the relationships among different methods of assessing adherence and glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

机构信息

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1997, USA.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2012 Jan;31(1):35-42. doi: 10.1037/a0024704. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1037/a0024704
PMID:21767017
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The present study examined four methods of assessing diabetes adherence (self-report, diary measure, electronic monitoring, and provider rating) within a population of youth with Type I Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM).

METHODS

Comparisons were conducted among the four methods of assessing diabetes adherence. Associations among the seven different measures of blood glucose monitoring (BGM) and HbA1c were examined. An exploratory stepwise regression analysis was conducted to determine the best predictors of glycemic control (i.e., Hemoglobin A1c; HbA1c) while controlling for relevant demographic variables.

RESULTS

The adherence measures appeared to be interrelated. The relationships between many of the BGM measures and HbA1c demonstrated a medium effect size. The Self Care Inventory (SCI) adjusted global score was the strongest predictor of HbA1c, even after taking the demographic variables into account.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCI is a robust, easy-to-use, and cost-efficient measure of adherence that has a strong relationship to HbA1c. Demographic variables are important to examine within the context of different methods of assessing adherence. The research methodology utilized to assess both general diabetes adherence and more specific behavioral measurements of BGM should be clearly documented in future studies to ensure accurate interpretation of results.

摘要

目的

本研究在患有 1 型糖尿病(T1DM)的青年人群中,考察了四种评估糖尿病治疗依从性(自我报告、日记测量、电子监测和提供者评估)的方法。

方法

比较了评估糖尿病治疗依从性的四种方法。考察了七种不同血糖监测(BGM)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)测量方法之间的相关性。进行了探索性逐步回归分析,以确定在控制相关人口统计学变量的情况下,血糖控制(即血红蛋白 A1c;HbA1c)的最佳预测因子。

结果

依从性测量方法似乎相互关联。许多 BGM 测量方法与 HbA1c 之间的关系显示出中等效应大小。自我护理量表(SCI)调整后的全球评分是 HbA1c 的最强预测因子,即使考虑到人口统计学变量也是如此。

结论

SCI 是一种强大、易用且具有成本效益的依从性测量方法,与 HbA1c 具有很强的相关性。在评估不同依从性评估方法时,人口统计学变量很重要。在未来的研究中,应明确记录用于评估一般糖尿病依从性和更具体的 BGM 行为测量的研究方法,以确保对结果的准确解释。

相似文献

1
Exploratory analysis of the relationships among different methods of assessing adherence and glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus.探究性分析评估 1 型糖尿病青少年治疗依从性和血糖控制的不同方法之间的关系。
Health Psychol. 2012 Jan;31(1):35-42. doi: 10.1037/a0024704. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
2
Parental involvement in diabetes management tasks: relationships to blood glucose monitoring adherence and metabolic control in young adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.父母参与糖尿病管理任务:与胰岛素依赖型糖尿病青少年血糖监测依从性及代谢控制的关系
J Pediatr. 1997 Feb;130(2):257-65. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70352-4.
3
The impact of modifiable family factors on glycemic control among youth with type 1 diabetes.可改变的家庭因素对1型糖尿病青少年血糖控制的影响。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2008 Aug;9(4 Pt 2):373-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00370.x.
4
Measures of Adherence and Challenges in Using Glucometer Data in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: Rethinking the Value of Self-Report.青少年 1 型糖尿病患者使用血糖仪数据的依从性和挑战测量:重新思考自我报告的价值。
J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:1075428. doi: 10.1155/2017/1075428. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
5
Diabetes conflict outstrips the positive impact of self-efficacy on youth adherence and glycemic control in type 1 diabetes.糖尿病冲突超过了自我效能对 1 型糖尿病青少年依从性和血糖控制的积极影响。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2017 Nov;18(7):614-618. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12471. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
6
Family conflict, adherence, and glycaemic control in youth with short duration Type 1 diabetes.初发1型糖尿病青少年的家庭冲突、依从性与血糖控制
Diabet Med. 2002 Aug;19(8):635-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00752.x.
7
Illness representations predict adherence in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes.疾病认知预测 1 型糖尿病青少年及年轻患者的治疗依从性。
Psychol Health. 2014;29(9):985-98. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.899361. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
8
Prediction of adolescents' glycemic control 1 year after diabetes-specific family conflict: the mediating role of blood glucose monitoring adherence.糖尿病特异性家庭冲突后1年青少年血糖控制的预测:血糖监测依从性的中介作用
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Jul;165(7):624-9. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.86.
9
Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.连续血糖监测对 1 型糖尿病青少年和年轻成人血糖控制的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2388-2396. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6940.
10
Blood glucose monitoring and glycemic control in adolescence: contribution of diabetes-specific responsibility and family conflict.青少年的血糖监测和血糖控制:糖尿病特异性责任和家庭冲突的贡献。
J Adolesc Health. 2010 Aug;47(2):191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.01.012. Epub 2010 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Mealtime Insulin BOLUS Score More Strongly Predicts HbA1c Than the Self-Care Inventory in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.与自我护理量表相比,进餐时胰岛素大剂量评分能更有力地预测1型糖尿病青少年的糖化血红蛋白水平。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Mar;19(2):340-344. doi: 10.1177/19322968231192979. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
2
Hope and mealtime insulin boluses are associated with depressive symptoms and glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus.希望和进餐时胰岛素剂量与青少年 1 型糖尿病患者的抑郁症状和血糖控制有关。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Nov;19(7):1309-1314. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12695. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
3
Measures of Adherence and Challenges in Using Glucometer Data in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: Rethinking the Value of Self-Report.
青少年 1 型糖尿病患者使用血糖仪数据的依从性和挑战测量:重新思考自我报告的价值。
J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:1075428. doi: 10.1155/2017/1075428. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
4
The Role of Authoritative Parenting in Adolescent Type 1 Diabetes Management.权威型教养方式在青少年 1 型糖尿病管理中的作用。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Mar 1;43(2):185-194. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx107.
5
Adolescents', mothers', and fathers' reports of adherence across adolescence and their relation to HbA1c and daily blood glucose.青少年、母亲和父亲关于整个青春期依从性的报告及其与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和每日血糖的关系。
J Behav Med. 2016 Dec;39(6):1009-1019. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9771-5. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.1型糖尿病成人患者中用于预测血糖控制的依从性评估与血糖监测措施的比较:一项横断面研究
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2016 Jul 29;8:54. doi: 10.1186/s13098-016-0162-4. eCollection 2016.
7
Frequency of Missed Insulin Boluses in Type 1 Diabetes and Its Impact on Diabetes Control.1型糖尿病患者胰岛素追加剂量遗漏的频率及其对血糖控制的影响。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Jun;18(6):341-2. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0142. Epub 2016 May 20.
8
The relation of questionnaire and performance-based measures of executive functioning with Type 1 diabetes outcomes among late adolescents.青少年晚期1型糖尿病患者中,问卷调查与基于表现的执行功能测量指标与糖尿病结局的关系。
Health Psychol. 2016 Jul;35(7):661-669. doi: 10.1037/hea0000326. Epub 2016 May 12.
9
Adherence in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes: strategies and considerations for assessment in research and practice.1型糖尿病青少年的依从性:研究与实践中评估的策略及考量因素
Diabetes Manag (Lond). 2015 Nov;5(6):485-498. doi: 10.2217/dmt.15.41.
10
Validation of a contemporary adherence measure for children with Type 1 diabetes: the Diabetes Management Questionnaire.1型糖尿病患儿现代依从性测量方法的验证:糖尿病管理问卷
Diabet Med. 2015 Sep;32(9):1232-8. doi: 10.1111/dme.12682. Epub 2015 Jan 30.