Suppr超能文献

慢性内侧副韧带松弛会影响前交叉韧带重建的结果吗?:一项至少三年随访的前瞻性评估。

Does chronic medial collateral ligament laxity influence the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?: a prospective evaluation with a minimum three-year follow-up.

作者信息

Zaffagnini S, Bonanzinga T, Marcheggiani Muccioli G M, Giordano G, Bruni D, Bignozzi S, Lopomo N, Marcacci M

机构信息

Laboratorio di Biomeccanica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano, 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Aug;93(8):1060-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B8.26183.

Abstract

We have shown in a previous study that patients with combined lesions of the anterior cruciate (ACL) and medial collateral ligaments (MCL) had similar anteroposterior (AP) but greater valgus laxity at 30° after reconstruction of the ACL when compared with patients who had undergone reconstruction of an isolated ACL injury. The present study investigated the same cohort of patients after a minimum of three years to evaluate whether the residual valgus laxity led to a poorer clinical outcome. Each patient had undergone an arthroscopic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a semitendinosus-gracilis graft. In the combined ACL/MCL injury group, the grade II medial collateral ligament injury was not treated. At follow-up, AP laxity was measured using a KT-2000 arthrometer, while valgus laxity was evaluated with Telos valgus stress radiographs and compared with the uninjured knee. We evaluated clinical outcome scores, muscle girth and time to return to activities for the two groups. Valgus stress radiographs showed statistically significant greater mean medial joint opening in the reconstructed compared with the uninjured knees (1.7 mm (SD 0.9) versus 0.9 mm (SD 0.7), respectively, p = 0.013), while no statistically significant difference was found between the AP laxity and the other clinical parameters. Our results show that the residual valgus laxity does not affect AP laxity significantly at a minimum follow up of three years, suggesting that no additional surgical procedure is needed for the medial collateral ligament in combined lesions.

摘要

我们在之前的一项研究中表明,与单纯前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤重建的患者相比,前交叉韧带和内侧副韧带(MCL)联合损伤的患者在ACL重建后30°时前后(AP)松弛度相似,但外翻松弛度更大。本研究对同一组患者进行了至少三年的随访,以评估残留的外翻松弛度是否会导致较差的临床结果。每位患者均接受了使用半腱肌-股薄肌移植物的关节镜下双束ACL重建。在ACL/MCL联合损伤组中,未治疗II级内侧副韧带损伤。随访时,使用KT-2000关节测量仪测量AP松弛度,同时使用Telos外翻应力X线片评估外翻松弛度,并与未受伤的膝关节进行比较。我们评估了两组的临床结果评分、肌肉周长和恢复活动的时间。外翻应力X线片显示,与未受伤的膝关节相比,重建膝关节的平均内侧关节开口在统计学上有显著增加(分别为1.7 mm(标准差0.9)和0.9 mm(标准差0.7),p = 0.013),而AP松弛度和其他临床参数之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。我们的结果表明,在至少三年的随访中,残留的外翻松弛度对AP松弛度没有显著影响,这表明联合损伤中内侧副韧带无需额外的手术治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验